Mostly agree except about disconnecting from the internet, classic SMS/voice calls aren’t any more private than VoIP.

Your best bet for location privacy is E2E encrypted services like Signal over wifi, plus MAC randomization and a VPN on untrusted networks. I’d say GrapheneOS is good enough for most people, but mobile Linux has also come a long way.

Why not plug a dumb dehumidifier into a Home Assistant controlled outlet?

She-Hulk was a TV show, and IMO it’s among the better half of Marvel shows (which isn’t saying much).

Same goes for JS, for example the onclick attribute.

It can also include inline JS. HTML alone cannot be turing complete, but HTML+CSS is.

Where does it say the first ship is traveling near the speed of light?

Sure, but by your definition any thought containing any kind of language would not be “original” because it requires familiarity with the language.

it includes absolutely nothing that’s already familiar to you

I truly do not believe that any thought exists without context, if you can find any examples I would be happy to be proven wrong.

By that definition no human has ever had an “original” thought.

AlphaPhoenix is definitely one of the best scientists on YouTube, that video is good.

Are you sure vsync is disabled? It looks like you’re getting a very consistent 144fps.

I personally keep vsync enabled, but you should absolutely disable it if you’re testing your hardware since it forces the fps to never exceed you monitor’s refresh rate.

As for throttling, it’s only useful as a diagnosis tool. First and foremost you should be finding other people’s benchmarks of your hardware (cpu/gpu) and running those benchmarks yourself at the same settings. Phoronix is a great resource for Linux benchmarks.

Maybe for certain AI workloads, absolutely not for any games. Their drivers are already very well optimised, and the raster performance barely changed this generation.

You can specifically target crawlers that ignore robots.txt, which will catch practically every LLM scraper.

It’s actually impossible to detect someone doing this without storing passwords in plaintext, which is incredibly insecure.

This is nothing like GregTech! Where’s the tedious microcrafting to enjoy before every search?

At what point did I move the goalposts? I never denied that the recordings existed. I simply fail to see how someone at Apple would decide that selling private conversations is worth the insane risk.

Do you have any proof they sold that data? I’d love to know why the plaintiffs settled out of court if they thought they could prove Apple is feeding every voice recording into their ads. They had to pay 5x as much just for slowing down old iPhones, actively selling voice recordings would undoubtedly be worth far more than that.

The issue is that contractors had access to the recordings, which is certainly a breach of privacy, but not a grand conspiracy to target ads.

That Siri was bugged in a way that activated it unintentionally, which then sends recordings to Apple, is not in dispute. Turning that into “they’re always recording your conversations” is a big leap. Why would the whistleblower that revealed the recordings being misused not bother mentioning that?

So Apple and Google have created the most sophisticated spyware known to man, so undetectable that tens of thousands of developers and researchers have never even seen a sign of it, and then they use the data for ads so sloppily that anyone can prove they’re listening?

It’s not quite as fancy as nala, but apt also has colour support since 2.9.