A healthy, broadly educated population, which feels safe and secure, are incompatible with, and toxic to, conservative and authoritarian ideologies.

They need you to be sick, stupid, and scared.

My original post never even referred to you, unless you’re also morbidly wealthy.

Manufacturing imaginary attacks similarly manifests harms to legitimate discourse.

As a medically morbidly obese guy, I have absolutely zero issues with invoking obesity as an apt technical description of the unhealthy and damaging consequences resultant of the tolerance of their existence.

Those who qualify to be diagnosed as medically obese typically don’t have a readily available remedy for their condition, but the financially obese can legitimately be held solely responsible for their rehabilitation.

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

Money is real.

The tokens burned to extrude this clearly qualify for a monstrous bulk discount.

Why would one’s exposure to raw sewage be decided democratically? I’d prefer experts with proven qualifications to be in control of such decisions, not a clown convulsing in the tank naked covered raw whip marks.

I’m genuinely curious which part of your reply we should interpret as intelligence?

If anything, these are Iterations, which I’ll add to the list.

Any instance of LLMs being adduced as intelligence must be mercilessly ridiculed and mocked. No one impressed by slop should ever be permitted contribution to decisions affecting anyone not similarly cognitively impaired.

LLMs are only AI as Accelerators and Amplifiers of Ignorance and Incompetence, with vanishingly scarce examples of Insight.

The most expensive seats need to be in the thruster nozzles.

I don’t trust anyone who is still impressed by LLMs enough to consider them to be in any way adjacent to intelligence.

That would be the preferred method of firing him.

The US has been a nation no-one should treat as a serious entity since 2024-11-05, and can not be again until they can prove their ability to hold another legitimate election, and concluded the Nuremberg-a-Lago trials.

s/could\ be/are/

They’re lobotomising tools. Vibe coding is just shoving one end of an ice pick up your nose, setting the other on a keyboard, and replacing its handle with a mains powered personal massager.

LLM output is one of the few places I’d be OK with seeing ads. I’d almost go so far as advocating for it to be mandated, because it would help make slop easier to identify and filter out.

AirPods Probe 2.1

‘AI’ fluffers sure do love the taste of grift flavoured tokens.

I’d ask what you were thinking, but it’s clear that played no material role in this extrusion. Extrapolating the assertion I constrained to a specific topic to the entirety of ‘tech’ is a bellowing straw man.

Further, the exclusively US centric examples of inappropriate stewards reveals the vantage to be squarely rooted inside that noxious bubble. The invocation of treason further betrays an affinity for national subservience.

To refine my original point, my observation of the application of LLMs is that the only entities who find them impressive are those who expressly lack proven expertise in the area it’s being applied. The correlation appears to be nearly linearly, inversely proportional.

LLMs could eventually prove innately useful, but there’s no indication they’re close to that, let alone traversing a relevant vector.

Personally, any world populated with entities who are impressed by LLMs is a world not worth living in.

My brother died when his daughter was 3. At his funeral she asked when she would get her nose back.

There could be many use cases, and some of them may even be legitimate, but I’m yet to observe any which have broad applicability, and they should only ever be wielded by a responsible, expert adult.

The actual span is a random period between 2 and 4 weeks, it’s interesting to watch how long it takes for attempts to resume.

I prefer a more granular visibility, repeat offenders automagically ratchet up their stay in the sin bin.

It’s telling that you assumed the description applied exclusively to LLMs.

No one who persists in labelling LLMs as ‘AI’ should be treated as an authority on the subject, and I’d argue it’s one of the greatest indicators of how little they comprehend the situation.