I am not a robot. I promise.

  • 32 Posts
  • 1.7K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 9th, 2023

help-circle







  • I long ago lost that monitor and related hardware over the sands of time, moving one place to another multiple times.

    The benefit though was that I effectively quadrupled the number of pixels on screen from the common 1024x768 resolution of the time.

    1024x2=2048, 768x2=1536

    I was basically pioneering early extra high definition video output before it was even a thing.

    The images themselves wouldn’t look any different, except smaller as each pixel was only 1/4 of original size, giving me a much larger visible pixel area for image editing.

    It wouldn’t have helped gameplay much though, as I had to sacrifice framerate to accomplish that.

    Edit: You definitely can’t do shit like that on modern LCDs, that category of overclocking is exclusive to old CRTs.



  • It was officially rated for a max of 1280x1024, 50Hz progressive. The more common resolution of choice back then was 1024x768, 60Hz.

    Well I wanted a much higher resolution than that, so by absolutely maxing out the horizontal output transistor frequency to 64KHz and doing some quick number crunching, I was able to make a custom display mode of 2048x1536, 25Hz interlaced.

    Although the vertical refresh rate got both cut in half and also switched to interlaced, it still absolutely qualifies as overclocking, because the horizontal output transistor (HOT) is basically the most stressed out non high voltage component in any CRT monitor.

    Running the HOT at the bleeding edge of the manufacturer’s frequency rating of 64KHz could and would indeed burn it out prematurely if run too long like that, especially without additional cooling, so I didn’t run it too damn long like that, but I just wanted to see if it was even possible.

    The monitor itself was from 1994, so it was effectively all analog, no digital onscreen menus, no signal checking and no error message on the screen to say boohoo video mode not supported, the monitor just tuned itself to the signal and frequencies I calculated and arranged for it.

    It did however have quite a few analog image transform buttons on its front panel though, for things like trapezoid and shear distortion, raster rotation, corner bowing, etc, lots of things most monitors from 1994 didn’t have, which meant the CRT yoke had probably twice as many deflection coils as a regular consumer CRT.

    Not bad for a monitor from 1994 that probably never saw anything over 1024x768 in practical use before I ever acquired it. I got literally 4 times the pixels of the typical desktop resolution of the time.

    Was it worth it? For daily use, no. For learning experience, absolutely!


  • Yeah, you’re right about shitty computer brands ~20 years ago. Turned out they were all shitty in the long run, as that was back during the Taiwanese counterfeit capacitor plague… ☹️

    As far as vehicles go, I don’t much care for luxury features, that’s just more points of failure. And now they got all the sensors, modules, cameras and stuff on the CAN bus, which is good for the manufacturer because it reduces the copper wiring, but bad for the consumer, as one faulty shorted sensor can take down the entire data bus and basically brick your car.

    Just give me a vehicle that cranks, runs, drives, and stops when I got places to go, and is easy to troubleshoot and repair as necessary. The most luxury I care for is heater and air conditioning. I’ll trade in the push button windows for hand crank rollup windows as long as the vehicle comes with a spare tire. I don’t want any vehicle that tracks everywhere you go, records everything you do, and can be bricked remotely by the police.

    Our current vehicle is a 2005 Hyundai Tucson, roommate’s had it going on 4 years now I think, for $3000. At first it had some running issues, but after a new coil pack, crankshaft position sensor, and mass airflow sensor, it purrs like a kitten ever since. And those sensors are cross compatible between Hyundai Tucson and Kia Sportage from 1999 to 2010, meaning both used and new parts aren’t too difficult to find.

    And it’s not on a payment plan, he outright owns it 👍


  • And that’s half of how we ended up in the era of enshittification.

    Let’s say one of the control knobs on your 15 year old dumb stove fails, shorted out, where as soon as you turn it to low heat the eye is blazing hot at full heat. Do you?..

    • A. Just not use that eye anymore
    • B. Buy a new control knob and get another 10 years out of it
    • C. Buy a whole new stove, that may last 5 years, and wants you to connect to the internet so they can eventually brick the firmware

    We went with option B, way cheaper than a new stove, plus none of the headaches of modern digital technology. Like, why do appliances need modern digital technology? A stove heats food, plain and simple, and that’s all it needs to do.

    And look at these new refrigerators coming out, that fail within weeks to months, maybe at best a couple or few years. When your grandma’s old fridge was passed down from her mom and has been kicking strong for 50 years, save for that new door seal installed like 15 years ago…

    Sigh, we live in a disposable dystopia anymore ☹️



  • Yes. Well, the older ones anyways, before they got full digital phase locking anyways.

    I had a dumb but rather high tech 15 inch CRT for it to have come from 1994. No smart logic though, just a few relays you had to trigger with certain frequencies. No error messages, no safety checks, the thing either accepted the signal or it didn’t. Or it could explode, that was the fun in trying, and yeah it actually worked and didn’t explode!

    How did I do it? Well, by then I had an XP system and an Nvidia GeForce FX 5200. Wait, this was in late 2005 or early 2006 come to think of it…

    Anyways, I checked all the details of the monitor’s supported frequencies, both horizontal and vertical. I found the max resolution, while compromising on the framerate, I used 25Hz interlaced to achieve that, with the Nvidia Control Center of the time…


  • No, I was born half blind as a bat, and nobody would let me get close enough to see anything up close.

    My vision is about 20/500 without glasses, meaning that if I should be able to see it from 500 feet, I have to be 20 feet away to see it. Very very blurry without glasses.

    I finally got glasses at age 8, and finally saw a clock at age 9. I had to teach myself how to read it though, but that was kinda easy once I could actually see the damn thing! 🕘





  • And then the parent’s employers have to shift their times SCHEDULES

    Its not the times that would change, it would be the schedules. Half the year you gotta arrive at school at 6am and the other half you gotta arrive at 7am. Then half the year the parents gotta arrive at work at 8am and the other half the year they gotta arrive at 9am.

    And it would be left upon the schools and businesses to explain all this shit to all the students/employees every time they change schedule.

    Believe me, the numbers would still be changing, it would just get way more confusing and difficult for everyone.

    Easier to change all the clocks and keep the schedules the same, so people get up around sunrise, rather than expect all the schedules to change…


  • Oh, as far as daylight savings time changes, there are complications to that regarding seasonal changes and when the sun rises and falls…

    • During winter months of the year, school children end up having to go out to their bus stops while it’s still pitch black dark for another hour or so. Is that safe? Not at all. That’s how children get abducted, being out in the night waiting for the bus.
    • Do you expect the schools to readjust all their time schedules for kids that might barely even understand the flow of time and the change of seasons to compensate for shorter vs longer days?

    There’s more to this than the simplicity of the numbers on the clock, there’s also the complexity of the seasons and shorter vs longer days.