

These took 5 minutes to make
Honestly we should just move on to device based attestation and if parents want to protect their kids they set up child mode.
I’m not responsible for lazy parenting.
These took 5 minutes to make
Honestly we should just move on to device based attestation and if parents want to protect their kids they set up child mode.
I’m not responsible for lazy parenting.
I would never admit this happened to me
I’m sure the number is higher than 2
All I’ve got is a nubby yubikey nano
Just having user agent header based attestation would work for most people.
It would be easy to bypass sure, but kids are boomer levels of tech illiterate these days.
Parents should be setting up content restrictions, the government has no place making us submit ask to view porn.
The failure of parents is not my problem.
To be fair, I’m not sure why firebase even has a public access option. That’s a recipe for issues.
Though if it’s anything like Google Cloud Store, they hopefully make it very clear that your bucket is public.
More bytes for Ur buck?
You guys have Babylonian deer?
But anything the US feds contracted them for, like building data centres, they have to comply or they face penalties and have to pay all the costs back.
10 days ago, a week before this was announced, they awarded $200M contracts each to Anthropic, OpenAI, Google and xAI
This doesn’t doom the public versions, but they now have a pretty strong incentive to save money and make them comply with the US governments new definition of truth.
You’re not tricking me with those discount dice
I’ve been warned your tricks!
What do they do with the daddy computers? All of mine only have female ports.
The first few iterations were good, when they went mass market they let quality go.
Yeah, sadly SpaceX and Tesla are both very promising companies primarily held back by Elon Musk.
Occom’s rasor: BF is googling plan B and birth control after he raw dog’s her, and the ads are linked to devices on that home network.
Well it is owned by Oracle now
I don’t know rust, but for example in Swift the type system can make things way more difficult.
Before they added macros if you wanted to write ORM code on a SQL database it was brutal, and if you need to go into raw buffers it’s generally easier to just write C/objc code and a bridging header. The type system can make it harder to reason about performance too because you lose some visibility in what actually gets compiled.
The Swift type system has improved, but I’ve spent a lot of time fighting with it. I just try to avoid generics and type erasure now.
I’ve had similar experiences with Java and Scala.
That’s what I mean about it being nice to drop out of setting up some type hierarchy and interfaces and just working with a raw buffers or function pointers.
I actually do like that C/C++ let you do this stuff.
Sometimes it’s nice to acknowledge that I’m writing software for a computer and it’s all just bytes. Sometimes I don’t really want to wrestle with the ivory tower of abstract type theory mixed with vague compiler errors, I just want to allocate a block of memory and apply a minimal set rules on top.
Reminds me of java
I have Toolkit toolkit = Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit();
seared into my brain. Then there were the bean factories…
In defence of plants, it takes a highly evolved form of life to be able to do nothing all day and get away with it.
I tried following my cat and all he lead me to was his food bowl.
You know, this, and the using wifi to see through walls stuff to me just immediately seemed to fall into “don’t research this, it can only be used for evil”.
I don’t get why we bother studying these types of things.