Misleading you to what conclusion that you wouldn’t otherwise have reached?
Misleading you to what conclusion that you wouldn’t otherwise have reached?
I agree, and whilst I don’t personally bother with vpns myself because I prefer other solutions, it’s one of the things that helps prevent insane UK politicians’ bad hottakes on tech becoming law
Edit: an apostrophe
Couldn’t agree with you more. In particular, the way most state pensions are structured imply infinite exponential growth. It’s gonna be a tough drug to wean off of.
Sadly it’s not objectively false, it’s merely vague. There’s no equivocation whereby it actually specifies that the unit of measure is the individual animal, rather than, say, kg. It’s just playing on your assumptions (I did assume biomass fwiw, but who cares).
But anyway, the point made by sheer fucking biomass imbalance is surely the thing to focus on here? Now that we know what it means, and are in agreement that the wording should be clearer, the statistic is still egregious, isn’t it? Humans have taken far too much of the world for themselves IMO. Vastly diminishing returns for us, devestatingly larger impact on the environment, the more we push it.
I think biomass is probably more important than sheer number for these comparisons. Although I would also accept ‘proportion of world’s arable land being used to sustain them’ as I suspect the ratios come out pretty similar for obvious reasons.
Wait until a fantasy author gets hold of your name and has a very successful 4 series before it turns into miserable dross. Not so unique any more are ya, Khalesi?
Ok that’s incredible. I’m gonna get so lost now I’ve changed that setting. Magnificent
Is it worth reading? I’ve played Witcher 3 and saw the first (sometimes good, sometimes shit) series of the show, but never read any…
I nearly dismissed your review until you qualified your assessment of onion rings. I have transposed the order on those first two myself
Onion rings top, then tots, then everything else
Easy enough. Tells you what languages are supported. Also helps you debug a bad language label. Although does have the disadvantage that you still need the name of every language in every language (the existing state) and you don’t get to suddenly sqrt your data requirements for storing that
Yeah, and the comment you just replied to said: why not both? Language name in language up front, and language name in current language in parens. I think it’s a neat idea and absolutely would support that as a standard.
deleted by creator
Well who wants constraints anyway? The most inconvenient constraints in the wrong place can make certain things much more complicated to deal with… Now a nice, sensible normal Hilbert space, isn’t that lovely?
I just think complex vector spaces are a great place to stop your abstraction
You can, they map, but complex numbers are much much easier to deal with
Yeah but aren’t quaternions basically just a weird subgroup of 2x2 complex matrices?
Gotta get Jill of the Jungle on that bad boy
Reddit stopped being any good when that guy doing a batman/joker role reversal writing prompt stopped posting