knowing the small number of companies that have access to the computer power to actually do a training with that data
the 70,717 AI startups worldwide
https://edgedelta.com/company/blog/ai-startup-statistics
Not every company will be training a model as big as the big names, but combined that’s a hell of a lot.
Does it matter what the purpose was? It was still causing them issues hosting their site.
Ah ok. That makes sense where it came from then.
I think there was a lot of speculation and jokes about that’s what would happen next from people on here and other places.
They’ve said nothing of the sort.
With regards to this most people are just ignoring the law. VPN use has gone through the roof.
The wording on ofcom is “should not” not" must not". It’s not illegal, they just don’t want people to do it and want people to think that it is illegal.
Careful, you might summon the Wanky Shit Demon by mistake
Or the original name for Microsoft One Drive
This was my wife’s immediate comment when I showed her this
how much effort they put on showing the world the consequences of extremely stupid acts so the rest don’t have to do it.
Kinda sucks to be the world’s policy alpha tester though.
You think given how well thought through this online safety act has been that they’ll understand that would be an issue and legislate accordingly?
How many small businesses can afford such permit? Hell, I’d argue that even bigger companies will have a problem paying for that.
Feature, not a bug.
They want people back in offices to help landlords and property prices. This way they can say that remote work is not banned and it’s just companies choosing not to buy a permit and offer it.
Oh that makes it easier for the government.
Maybe that the end goal, force people back into the office by banning vpn
Ban remote working, vpn now only allowed from business addresses as registered with companies house.
Next step: ban on remote work.
What I don’t get is why it’s ok to view that at 18 but not at 17 years and 364 days. Surely just ban the site for everyone.
For example, the Government is very concerned about small platforms that host harmful content, such as forums dedicated to encouraging suicide or self-harm.
So they’ve identified a problem with this type of content, and the answer is to put it behind an age wall. So is it a-ok for anyone over 18 to be encouraged to self harm or commit suicide according to the government?
No, they’re notes. What I’m saying is your logic applies equally to bank notes as it does to cheques.
Also it’s much easier to triple a small number than a big one.