My general observation is that have placed yourself between two deceptive narratives, while also boldly framing yourself and neutral and enlightened.

One the one side, you have adopted a narrative that you present as unifying across a group you call tankies. On the other side, you have promoted the narrative constructed by Western states, most notably the US, and propagated through Western media, for the purpose of cultivating popular domestic support for their own expansionism.

Tankie is a term coined by leftists to discredit other leftists. Most generally, the usage has been anti-authoritarian leftists attacking authoritarian leftists, but the term has no fixed, precise meaning, and has been widely abused due to its vagueness and obscurity. As for authoritarian leftists, attitudes do vary considerably. Taking for example attitudes respecting the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, some are vulgar campists who glorify strongmen and deny atrocities, whereas others simply acquiesce to the painful reality that conflicts involving US imperialism always end in massive devastation, even while no credible antagonist of the US is itself driven by virtue. The latter is broadly shared by most serious leftists, including libertarian socialists and democratic socialists, who are also broadly critical of all authoritarians, including leftists who are authoritarian.

Specifically attacking tankies from a standpoint of reaction is counterproductive. Reactionaries obviously demean all leftists, but at best very rarely offer any characterizations that are accurate.

The dialogue that is promoted by you and this community is similarly counterproductive. It wastefully exaggerates the threat of the groups you criticize, and promotes broad conflations whose primary effects are to amplify antagonism and to poison the discourse. A much more serious approach to engaging leftism would be first learning and acknowledging the varied positions within and between distinct leftist tendencies, and then considering which specific positions you are inclined to accept versus to reject.

I cannot do any more than repeat my explanation one last time, that you are anchored to a straw man.

The basic fact is exceedingly simple. Hamas, a faction of Palestinians, is engaged in an armed struggle with Israel, which is perpetrating atrocities against Palestine.

Such an uncontroversial observation should not provoke such confusion or hostility.

Of course, it would be more favorable for Palestine to have the means of acquiring more potent military capacities.

If you want to ask a question, then please find one that is not meaningless within the context.

None of my explanation carries any relation to the relative wealth of Trump versus Putin.

You clearly are not understanding, and seeming so almost deliberately.

The bigger picture is that political struggles transcend any lone individual, isolated antecedent, or narrow objective.

If you want to discuss, please try to do so without relying on a straw man.

The reason you were banned was trolling.

Not admitting any responsibility for being disruptive and insincere is simply dishonest.

In fact, you seem to have a history of commenting in socialist communities with content that is provocative but also absurd.

Further, a memes community is generally not suited to starting debates.

Finally, no socialist group will roll out the red carpet for someone who propagates transphobia.

You are a Zionist front. The community contributors and moderator parrot debunked Israeli propaganda, and conflate anti-Zionism with antisemitism.

The particular term might not be my own way of describing the community, but it is generally an accurate observation that you dwell in a rabbit hole of reactionary misinformation.

The mod log shows no actions against you by Lefty Memes.

It is certainly in your interest to be conscious of others seeking that you be duped or manipulated.

The wealthy and powerful constantly deploy their massive resources to deceive the public into following a path that benefits those on top while keeping the mass of society repressed.

The long history of the US lying to its own population to justify overseas wars offers only among the most obvious examples of deceit being employed by the privileged in favor of the privileged.

As crises and discontent escalate around the world, the catalyst for such interests to create distractions from the real problems only becomes more substantial.

Overcoming such challenges begins with our recognition that effective solutions will not be handed down from above.

I have found it particularly ironic that Americans constantly lament the foolishness of trusting the government, yet they follow hook, line and sinker whenever state interests align with the public being made fearful of yet one more enemy.

I responded to your question appropriately, by observing that it is based on a distortion of language.

Hamas is, de facto, the current Palestinian resistance against Israeli atrocities.

Try asking a question politely and in good faith, if you genuinely want answers that promote the quality of discussion.

Bad Hasbara.

You are repeated debunked Zionist propaganda.

Terrorism is when acts of terror. I am very intelligent.

Hamas emerged from within the context of a brutal occupation.

Before Israel, there was no Hamas.

Before the Nakba, there was no Hamas.

Hamas is fundamentally a construct of colonial resistance.

It is not seriously a threat to any interests except Israel atrocities. Even if it did threaten Palestinians, the threat would be dwarfed by such atrocities of Israel. Palestinians are far safer through Hamas than they would be without Hamas. It is easy to imagine a superior alternative, but none actually exist in the present.

Palestinians would be in graver danger without Hamas. They correctly understand that their enemy is not Hamas. If Israel were defeated, then Palestinians would have much more expansive opportunities to develop different political configurations.

The State Department wants you to feel strong animus and contempt toward Putin, while remaining ignorant and incurious respecting the more general political maneuvering and historical developments.

In particular, it wants you to feel distracted from US imperialist atrocities and ambitions for imperialist expansion.

Writings and statements normally will not be fabricated out of whole cloth, as overt lies, but they will be presented as cherry picked and obfuscated, serving as a distraction from deeper issues and broader background.

Once again, your argument is circular and inane.

You are begging the question, of the particular acts and the reasons for their being characterized as terror.

The fact is that Israel labels Hamas as terrorist, because doing so function in service of its state interests. However, Israel has no credibility, and all of its claims should be strongly scrutinized.

Hamas is labeled terrorist because it was assigned the label by Israel.

Hamas is terrorist only as much as one terrorist entity is credible to decide exactly which groups or factions are terrorist.

More generally, terrorist simply is a label states assign to their non-state enemies.

By the same standards, the Continental Army would be terrorist, as would be been essentially every belligerent that has engaged in anti-colonial struggle.

Regardless, it should be concrete facts, not abstract labels, that are used to support arguments and conclusions.

You are being obtuse.

Hamas and Israel are opposing factions in armed struggle.

Israel seeks occupation, apartheid, and genocide over Palestine.

Hamas fights for the liberation of Palestine from Israel’s barbaric oppression.

It should not seem complicated.

Israel is a terrorist state that calls as terrorists those who challenge its ambitions of occupation, apartheid, and genocide.

Being vilified by Israel is not one and the same as being fundamentally wicked.

You are conflating issues that are distinct.

Your argument is circular and inane.

Try engaging substantively.

I said they tend to be informed, not that they are necessarily pleasant or tolerant.