

“Why don’t you decry the other atrocities that your government isn’t directly supporting with the same energy as the ones they are, huh??” It’s got some real “all lives matter” energy to it.


“Why don’t you decry the other atrocities that your government isn’t directly supporting with the same energy as the ones they are, huh??” It’s got some real “all lives matter” energy to it.
Yeah, this recreation is unrelated. Their reenactment was pretty great
Interestingly, in Canada “high tea” is a fancy afternoon tea with little sandwiches and desserts. Often something you can book at posh hotels like Fairmonts.


Your word for the day is yonic
If it’s not one thing, it’s your mother
You’re underestimating how massive cheeks can get
They’re puddling
Does that mean we get to drive kickass Cadillacs?

Redistriboobtion is now my political affiliation.
That’s a crane fly. They have lots of nicknames and folk identities so it’s super common to call them something else. I’ve heard them called “mosquito hawks” (they don’t hunt mosquitoes) but male mosquitoes is a new one to me. You could add it to the Wikipedia page lol
So I’d consider myself a very amateur entomologist so am very open to being wrong here, but that’s not a thing to my knowledge; if anything, the males tend to be smaller. You might be seeing two different species, or are misidentifying another insect for a male mosquito.


I drank the maximum for my weight and exertion that would just barely not cause water intoxication. Now, let me get a glass
Crane flies are significantly larger than mosquitoes and don’t swarm. Swarms near a lake are very typical of midges who look superficially like mosquitoes.
No, the feathery antennae is a way to tell males and females apart, not species. Male mosquitoes have feathery antennae, and so do males of many other fly and even other insect species.
Jokes on you; this near the solstice the sky doesn’t get dark enough for me to see anything anyways
They called them “gross-ups” and I love them.
Sorry, I’m bumping up against Poe’s Law with this comment so I think I’m misunderstanding your point.
I don’t own a subway, it’s not my organisation. I was just using my imagination to put myself in the shoes of others to understand their decisions.
Now then: You’re literally stating that having homeless people in a space causes social harm, and that making a place less hospitable for the homeless, even if it improves that place for its main function, is also a societal bad. Let’s accept that for the sake of argument. Why are the homeless camping in the subway? Doesn’t that mean they’ve already passed down from further up this displacement chain and the subway is also a victim of the same thing?
The subway and the homeless are both just dealing with their situations in the best ways they can. Asking the subway to house the homeless in their corridors is about as helpful as just telling those homeless people to stop being homeless.
RUN TO THE hILLS