Navidrome is planning on multi user ability, some parts of it already implemented.

But spinning a navidrone service up is so easy (proxmox helper script ftw) you can just spin up multiple side by side with some shared and some private libraries.

We (i) don’t actually know the rules for priests, just that its the origins for how it works for medical personnel.

This 100% feels very dangerous, psychiatrists provide a huge service to the public interests, you are advocating to undermine it with no nuance to individual cases.

Take for example. Someone with guilt and is contemplating to go to authorities themselves. The source material poop provided even starts with specifying refusal to consent as a possible requirement.

Good thing the job of psychiatrists has a high bar of required study and expertise.

Priest sadly not as much.

Fair

The fuller quote does not add more nuance here. I am not sure how you are deriving at your interpretation. Can you give an example of an “afformented case” that validates this exception?

It is not in the public interest to break doctor patient confidentiality about events that happend in the past when It is vastly better if the patient understands their wrongdoing and goed to law enforcement themselves. There is usually plenty of time to convince them if its clear there is no actual risk to a living person in the now.

There is no interview, there is a question i was curious about years ago while i had access to psychiatric professionals so inquired them about what the law said about it.

No, i just know how to read.

From your source:

“disclosing personal information may be justified in the public interest if failure to do so may expose others to a risk of death or serious harm.”

Admitting something happened in the past is not a risk something will happen in the future. I mentioned how they have an exception for when people are in danger in the near future in my comment.

Its not uncommon for patients to confess to something in the past that was covered up and is since no longer happening.

Also note how i said local laws may be different, this is a uk source. The professionals i asked this question where not from the UK.

To give you as much straightforward an example.

If a patient admits to having harmed many kids while they have or work with kids, thats is a reason to break secrecy.

But if they said they raped and murdered a kid 30 years ago. That alone is not enough to break secrecy, there is no automatic assumption of repeat offending.

FYI a dokter/psychiatrist is just as banned from exposing a confessed murder or rapist,

What they do instead is highly encourage you to turn yourself in.

The reason professional secrecy is so important is because the moment you leave the tiniest gap, no one will trust the profession anymore when processing the guilt of their own actions. Potentially making the problem worse. These people are not well in their head and require treatment, the bar for treatment must be as low and safe as can be.

I believe Dokters do have a rule when someone has full intention to do harm to a person in the near future they have to call law enforcement but i don’t think they need to provide information about the perpetrator if they aren’t the person in danger.

This may be subject to specific local laws but i always assumed it was modeled after how the church did it, pastors used to act as primitive psychologists.

This is actually an indication of how bad it really is.

Compared with someone who really is part of the elite, everyone who isn’t a millionaire is bottom of the ladder. You can own properties and go on global vacations and still be part of the poor class

If you would take the total estimation of combined US citizen owned money and redistributed evenly per household then every single US household would have over a million.

There is a common fear that socialism and redistribution of wealth implies you will end with less because most people believe they are better off then the majority and don’t want to share, just think about how twisted the people that propaganda comes from must be if a theoretical million is perceived as losing.

To be fair, do we know for certain that fungi do not experience some form of social life?

It may not be human sapience but the mycelium networks hint at some forms of communicating information.

Hardware does not need a steep upfront costs.

You don’t need a nasa pc to run nextcloud, larger businesses routinely trow away machines that are beyond what you need. Chances are family of a member already has some machines they where going to trow away. Your hardware priorities are most cpu cores with as much compatible ram.

The advantages of having your own hardware is you can run multiple local servers and let members experience without additional costs. Imagine it like a private mini internet run by members that only is accessible at location.

I highly recommend proxmox as a server os which has 1 line helper script commands that create a whole nextcloud installation and others automatically, its also very easy to backup those.

Underrated comment, power that sits unused will get preyed on.

My first interpretation of vibe coding was to code for fun and personal enjoyment without worrying about industry standards or deployability. More often see with self-taught youth.

I felt like i have been doing this for years before ai became a thing.

We need to split clients from providers.

Invidious and freetube could diversify to accept multiple alternative sources besides youtube content.

If the content exists on multiple platforms the user could set a preference and orded or backup providers.

As creators make a switch to smaller platforms the users who use these clients are unaffected. It works similar to our fediverse, a community can just change instance and everyone can still access it the same.

Creators could test migration by posting to multiple providers themselves. Those reliant on YouTube money specifically could premiere on youtube and after some time reupload elsewhere.

Those that dont rely on youtube money can do the reverse where the later youtube upload serves more as an ad to their alternative main channel.

Also a guess, isn’t a hand or any biological form not also the result of a mathematical pattern?

I do see how ai could replicate “a” blur but what it might not be able to do (yet) is replicate the unique blur of a specific device.

So maybe you couldn’t proof something is AI, but the physical lens as proof that it is not.

Not really, the prospect of getting my own computer at all brought immense excitement and i didn’t know what words like “operating system” and “software” even meant.

I can imagine it though since i got comfortable with using the terminal, a gui feels more and more like bloat.

As much as this can be a privacy issue couldn’t this be a feature to tell apart ai and real photos?

My first pc had windows 95 and it was indeed vastly better then todays corporate shite

Jokes on you, being an adult white male still doesn’t exclude you from being attacked.

Its maybe halfway getting there but you also need to make sure you are not queer, not emphatic to others and above all rich.

Whats the difference between expecting and predicting here?

BH was theoretical at first. The new breakthrough was empirical evidence.

How are you certain there are no undiscovered fundamental particles involved to quantum gravity and dark matter?

I don’t want to downplay some of the amazing things in this list but i dint think the standard model of physics as made by humans can ever be completed.

What did happen is that something like HB must exists in order to make most of other things work. Now that we know HB is verifiably real we tied up a major loose end.

But there is still many stuff unanswered and a “complete model” would require constant revision.