Some banks will deposit pension checks mailed to them directly. I’m not talking about electronic direct deposit

Why doesn’t he have the pension checks mailed directly to the bank for deposit?

Thingy. Thingie would be pronounced like Thin-jee

I read a study that people used to focus on remembering information they learned, but given the opportunity (Internet, books) instead they focused on remembering the location of the information they learned so that they could access it later

What you say

If you want to pick up girls, try eating a whole pineapple. Just hold it in one hand and bite through the armor plating. Girls love that

Yeah it’s in the secure enclave RAM while it’s processed. RAM is memory.

In my state it is illegal to transcribe and summarize a conversation if both parties do not consent. Saying that it records and transcribes and summarizes really quickly doesn’t seem like a valid defence.

It’s recording into the device memory and then transferring to the iPhone’s device memory. It’s still recording.

Also it says it does transcribe it. “On-device speech recognition transcribes the audio to text, and then an on-device language model generates a condensed version”

I think this is an option that a user can enable. So it’s not something apple is doing without the users knowledge. Still, other people may not be aware they are being recorded and that the person is getting summaries of the conversation.

I’m sure there are audio recording apps available for iWatch which could be used more nefariously. Still, I’m not sure it would be legal for a person to create and use a device that “secretly” transcribes audio, but it’s Apple so I’m sure their lawyers can figure it out.

It says it IS recording, then the recording is transferred to the user’s iPhone where it’s transcribed and the recording is then deleted and the transcription is uploaded.

It’s still recording. And transcribing conversations where someone should have an expectation of privacy.

In my state you are not allowed to record conversations if there is a reasonable expectation of privacy.

When I went to Japan I thought it was really cool how people felt free to express themselves by dressing in all black or outfits that looked like costumes, or to dye their hair unusual colors like blue.

I wish we felt free to do that in the US. Too many people looking down their noses at everyone, there’s an unspoken pressure to conform. When I see movies or videos of people from the late 90s wearing baggy pants with dyed hair (I dressed like that too) I think about how strange it looks, but then remember that that attitude is part of the problem.

When I boot up windows 98se I feel like teenage Shakira

John Apple

Yes that is poor editorial decision making by the studio to spoil the content. Do you really think about watching a movie and then decide to just watch the trailer instead? I think that the discussion is related to damages resulting from people who will watch a recap instead of watching a show.

And yet drive through restaurant cashiers are able to interact with drivers daily. And toll booth operators as well. The biggest danger from writing a ticket on the side of the road is other vehicles. Police have the discretion of when to escalate a situation. For example, when to attempt an arrest- They can call for backup or wait until the situation can be safely resolved.

If police need to go to therapy and then they should. If they cannot do their job without suffering from trauma then they should resign.

A recap is for people who have already watched the show and want a reminder or for people who are familiar with the show but want to skip some episodes. A lot of people watch movie trailers and then jokingly say they don’t need to watch the movie because it was all in the trailer. A recap is not a substitute for people who want to watch the show. That’s my opinion.

Narrated recaps are pretty popular. They exist for every show. It’s interesting that this case is moving forward

I think one of the problems that encompasses the flock debate besides the privacy issues is the relationship that the police have with people in the United States. Most police view people as a threat and if you look at the police training they teach them to be extremely violent. During simple traffic stops most police are on edge and have an attitude like they might be violent with you. I’m just talking about the general atmosphere- I’m not even getting into all of the examples where police have killed people for no reason, falsified information to arrest innocent people, and generally abused their power.

Did police want to wear body cams or did they want to continue without accountability? Police have a responsibility and have taken an oath. They should be required to have cameras.

In a society where all of its parts work together towards the same goal, ALPRs would not be a problem. In the US this surveillance is very worrisome.

Now they’re pretty sure that people used boats and skirted the coastline but didn’t walk.

This is a great video about human migration to the Americas https://youtu.be/UsnrdCdGs7o

I think that number is just for a guaranteed successful outcome. Aboriginal people migrated to Australia with maybe as few as a few dozen