Yes, and we’re in denial about it.

Ah, the late, great Hannibal Lecter.

The deadliest chemical

Every time I hear someone talking up prompt engineering, I feel like I should say something. But I don’t.

Thank you for your cooperation.

I like that someone in a position of authority is talking about this.

Sounds like insecurity to me.

Maybe I’m slow or something, but I don’t get how eating meat is masculine.

Yeah, but that’s not as funny

Definitely overshot the brag with 4.9 inches thick.

Is he saying he has a dick like two toilet paper rolls stacked on top of each other?

Mostly I just remember the burns on my legs from the engine.

And then the motorcycle being broken and never getting fixed. I suspect my mom sabotaged it.

This is me and my dad. It isn’t, but it is.

Hey isn’t that the Qunol guy?

I really wish you had asked a few years ago. Then perhaps I could have avoided this horrible mistake. But, oh well. 🤷‍♂️

He’s doing the Lord’s work.

And I don’t mean to denigrate data science. It is important and powerful. And real machine intelligence may one day emerge from it (or data science may one day point the way). But data science just isn’t AI.

This is because the AI of today is a shit sandwich that we’re being told is peanut butter and jelly.

For those who like to party: All the current “AI” technologies use statistics to approximate semantics. They can’t just be semantic, because we don’t know how meaning works or what gives rise to it. So the public is put off because they have an intuitive sense of the ruse.

As long as the mechanics of meaning remain a mystery, “AI” will be parlor tricks.

If you’re hypothetical, then yes, by implication. 🤗

You remember when it was beans? Those were the days.