I assumed this was created using some mobile phone editor that doesn’t support something this “advanced”.

But I agree, black font + white border (or vice versa) is ideal.

Unrelated, but I feel like brown is among the worst font colors they could’ve chosen for the caption.

You don’t even have to use something obnoxious like neon green. Other unobtrusive colors like black or yellow would’ve worked well without blending in at the bottom.

Also if the hive is in a region with harsh winters you’re gonna be thrown out in late autumn to die provided you remained a virgin.

A couple things:

1. Drones are male bees whose only purpose is fucking the queen and then dying. They’re not really in need of a union or maternal leave.
2. Even if this offer were for workers, it’s pretty empty too. Paid vacation, union rights and maternal leave are mandatory by law already over here. Also worker bees are female and cannot take maternal leave due to infertility (and presumable lack of adoption rights in the hive)
3. What if we overthrew the monarchy instead of joining it? Jkjk… unless?? 😳

By fucking obviousness.

At least that’s what a court would rule, likely with more formal terminology.

I’d purchase one if it 100% reliably cleaned both me and itself after use, without any (further) user interaction.

Bing/DDG has also blocked the emulation wiki (https://emulation.gametechwiki.com/) for some reason. I noticed when I forgot the domain and tried looking for the site.

For the record, Google returns it as the top result.

No? Two separate pieces of information aren’t two factors.

But this would be the factor “ownership” and “knowledge”. Anyone attempting to hack into OP’s account needs both the paper (or a copy thereof) AND the password. Just like withdrawing money from ab ATM requires the card and a PIN.

Though the fact you can easily copy the paper makes it a pretty weak “ownership” factor. Just like how using eye color would be a pretty weak “identity” factor.

Reason #186729 why it’s insane to have no right to privacy in public.

Fun fact: Recording the public is illegal in Germany. Any private video camera must only be able to record your own property. If you do record (and store - smart doorbells without storage that are only active when they are rung are exempted) material you must have visible warnings (that others can see BEFORE being recorded) or else any evidence you collect is likely to be thrown out in court.

Only thing I can recommend (as well as for literally any script) is using set -u. Only because it’s awful to debug unset variables and there’s never a use case for using unset variables.

A king without a porcelain throne? How curious…

I think the three women in the audience (assuming gender based on haircut and triangular portrusions on the upper torso) must fight to death to ensure all their wants are met.

At most two women are allowed to hate women! If there are three or more, then the women-hating women would be hated back by women (instead of no woman hating back in the case of one woman or one woman [a ≠ e] hating back in the case of two women).

It can result in some rather clunky terms though.

And frankly, “fructose foster parent” is cheating. That’s on the same level as, say, “sugar step daddy”.

Why do they need to be alliterations though? I mean, sugar daddy isn’t one either.

Yes, that is why I mentioned the IAU’s definition was more specific.

Very large? Enough mass to have a round shape.

Dwarf everything nearby? Clear out its orbit by colliding with/capturing/ejecting shit.

I propose a better definition:

Planets are very large objects orbitting a star that dwarf everything nearby

I’m pretty sure this is the intent of the IAU’s definition. It’s just more specific.

Do you mean the asteroids at the Lagrangian points? Every single planet has asteroids there because math/physics dictates those points to be stable. Jupiter has the most at its points because it’s the largest planet.

Same with Neptune cleaning its orbit: It has collided with every single thing in its orbit EXCEPT those that synced their orbits to Neptune. An object that is gravitationally dominated by a single planet should not be a planet under any definition.

Sources because I had to read into your claims and I’m no astrophysicist:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange_point

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resonant_trans-Neptunian_object

Unless you learned German in Austria-Hungary between 1879 and 1901 of course.

Could it make testing less conclusive? Part of testing is to see whether people actually enjoy the game. And I’d conjecture immersion-breaking placeholder assets could lead to worse testing reviews.