“When a product involves a variable, it is customary to omit the symbol X of multiplication. Thus, 3 X n is written 3n and means three times n, and a X b is written ab and means a times b.” Modern Algebra: Structure And Method, page 36. Immediately before the definition you’re now lying about.
Fuck your non-sequitur. a(b+c)2 is a*(b+c)2, as backed up by - for example - these four math textbooks. No textbook will ever say it produces an a2 term. You made it up. You’re just full of shit.
You so nearly had it, look “two things”! Yes axb is 2 Terms being Multiplied to make them one 😂
Immediately before the definition you’re now lying about
Nope! Says exactly what I already said, and I have no idea why you think it says otherwise. Now read the next page, which tells you ab is one Term and doesn’t say that axb is 1 Term. 🙄 You’re proven wrong by the very textbook you’re quoting from! 😂
Fuck your non-sequitur
Says person trying to disprove a(b+c)=(ab+ac) by dragging a(bc)²=ab²c² to try and make a false equivalence argument 😂
a(b+c)2 is a*(b+c)2
No it isn’t! 😂 The first is one term, the second is two terms
for example - these four math textbooks.
Says Mr. Ostrich, still ignoring the dozens of textbooks I posted saying a(b+c)=(ab+ac)
No textbook will ever say it produces an a2 term
No, it produces an ab term and an ac term, a(b+c)=(ab+ac) 🙄
You made it up. You’re just full of shit
Says Mr. Ostrich, now completely full of shit, still ignoring the dozens of textbooks I posted, including ones written before I was even born
a*b and ab are both the product of a and b, and a product is one term. As explained by the textbook you chose.
a*b2 is ab2, even if b=(x+y). No textbook you’re grasping for contains your made-up exception. They all show what I’m rubbing your nose in. You’re just full of shit.
Multiplying two things makes them one term.
“When a product involves a variable, it is customary to omit the symbol X of multiplication. Thus, 3 X n is written 3n and means three times n, and a X b is written ab and means a times b.” Modern Algebra: Structure And Method, page 36. Immediately before the definition you’re now lying about.
Fuck your non-sequitur. a(b+c)2 is a*(b+c)2, as backed up by - for example - these four math textbooks. No textbook will ever say it produces an a2 term. You made it up. You’re just full of shit.
You so nearly had it, look “two things”! Yes axb is 2 Terms being Multiplied to make them one 😂
Nope! Says exactly what I already said, and I have no idea why you think it says otherwise. Now read the next page, which tells you ab is one Term and doesn’t say that axb is 1 Term. 🙄 You’re proven wrong by the very textbook you’re quoting from! 😂
Says person trying to disprove a(b+c)=(ab+ac) by dragging a(bc)²=ab²c² to try and make a false equivalence argument 😂
No it isn’t! 😂 The first is one term, the second is two terms
Says Mr. Ostrich, still ignoring the dozens of textbooks I posted saying a(b+c)=(ab+ac)
No, it produces an ab term and an ac term, a(b+c)=(ab+ac) 🙄
Says Mr. Ostrich, now completely full of shit, still ignoring the dozens of textbooks I posted, including ones written before I was even born
Yes… to make them one.
a*b and ab are both the product of a and b, and a product is one term. As explained by the textbook you chose.
a*b2 is ab2, even if b=(x+y). No textbook you’re grasping for contains your made-up exception. They all show what I’m rubbing your nose in. You’re just full of shit.
Nope. Only ab is the product of a and b. axb is Multiplication of 2 terms
If you had read more than 2 sentences of it, you would discover that you cannot use axb to show the product, only ab 🙄
No it isn’t 😂 1/axb²=b²/a. 1/ab²=1/ab². Welcome to why we teach students about Terms 🙄
Law is the word you’re looking for, and I posted dozens of them here in this post which you keep ignoring Mr. Ostrich
Nope, they all show you are full of shit Mr. Ostrich. See previous link
“a X b is written ab and means a times b.”
Rub rub rub.
“a X b is written ab and means a times b.”
Rub rub rub.
Notice that it doesn’t say equals, speaking of Illiterate fraud, as per your other comment 🙄
They’re more than equal - ab means a*b. It’s an identity, which you’d understand, if you weren’t lying about being a teacher.
They’re not equal at all 🙄
If a=2, b=3…
1/ab=1/(2x3)=1/6
1/axb=1/2x3=3/2=1.5
Nope! axb==ab is an identity, which is NOT how it’s written, “illiterate fraud” as per your other comment
says person who is lying about what the textbook says 🙄
Convention saying 1/a(b+c)2 is 1/(a(b+c)2) instead of (1/a)(b+c)2 doesn’t change how only (b+c) is squared.