SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to memes@lemmy.world · 2 months agoGuess it was truelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1581arrow-down139file-textcross-posted to: AntiMeme@sopuli.xyz
arrow-up1542arrow-down1imageGuess it was truelemmy.dbzer0.comSnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to memes@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square43fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: AntiMeme@sopuli.xyz
minus-squarerenegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoAssuming the baby is a spherical point mass in a vacuum is so 101.
minus-squarebleistift2@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months ago spherical point That’s a new kind of math, definitely not 101.
minus-squarewischi@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-22 months agoSphere with radius zero. Problem solved 🤣
minus-squareCannonFodder@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoBut then quantum mechanics are significant, and you have black hole.
minus-squarewischi@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoBlack holes are GR and it wouldn’t make the calculations much different. Take the moon for example, the orbit would be exactly the same no matter if earth is a rocky planet, a black hole or a point mass.
minus-squareCannonFodder@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoYeah, but how are you gonna throw a black hole baby?
minus-squarerenegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoPoint mass for rotational inertia, sphere for air resistance.
Assuming the baby is a spherical point mass in a vacuum is so 101.
That’s a new kind of math, definitely not 101.
Sphere with radius zero. Problem solved 🤣
But then quantum mechanics are significant, and you have black hole.
Black holes are GR and it wouldn’t make the calculations much different. Take the moon for example, the orbit would be exactly the same no matter if earth is a rocky planet, a black hole or a point mass.
Yeah, but how are you gonna throw a black hole baby?
Point mass for rotational inertia, sphere for air resistance.