Currently, only GOG and Itch are still selling this game.

EDIT: It seems the game has returned to Humble Bundle.

  • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Unless it unexpectedly sells gangbusters, the dev says they’re likely to shut down as not having the massive steam audience to sell to won’t net them enough to continue. And people are stupidly loyal to valve for some reason.

    • Maestro@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s because Valve is privately owned and this has largely resisted the enshittification that largely plagues public companies and private equity frims.

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Except people give them passes for shit that they don’t extend to other companies. The blind loyalty is stupid

        • Zorque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Such as? Perhaps if you specified on what they’re getting a pass for people could be a little less blind.

    • Mark with a Z@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      It very well could be true, but the dev also seemed full of shit in the first interview I saw, pretending that he had no clue why it was banned.

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I mean, he released the communication he’s received. It’s not super clear. And the things he thinks it was isn’t even in the current version of the game

        • KaChilde@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          The response said “no CSAM”.

          If they had to scratch their heads trying to figure out what parts of the game needed to change to not include allusions to that, then they have bigger problems than not releasing on Steam.

          • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            They did change the one scene where that could have even conceivably applied. It wasn’t actually that to begin with, either.

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              The scene where a little girl asks to ride a naked man, and then rides a naked man? You don’t see why that might be problematic?

                • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  I don’t know but don’t give up. Try reading my post again, take it slow, I’m sure your can work it out.

    • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      23 hours ago

      They’d be as well carrying on. Its in a pretty unique position as being a game that people are talking about before its even finished, which is pretty uncommon for most titles, and can be “the game they tried to ban” which did wonders for Manhunt, GTA and Postal.

    • cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Valve is pretty upfront about being a business first and foremost. Their customers are loyal because they consistently provide high value at reasonable prices, even though they are in a dominating position in the market. They’ve taken unpopular decisions in the past, but never any that seriously alienated a meaningful chunk of their customer base.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Like for instance, when epic came out with their exclusive access titles being a part of their business plan, valve could have responded with their own exclusive access system and had a good chance of killing off epic and others in the process. Instead they just ignored it and people like me continued using them and didn’t even consider epic even when their anticompetitive actions switched to ones that would have benefitted me (free games), because I could see the shithole they wanted to bring gaming to if their platform achieved dominance.