I have yet to find one “contradiction” that actually holds any water. Usually it boils down to one writer describing angels as men while the other describes them as angels, or another writer mentioning details that another didn’t. If anything, it shows a lack of corroboration which makes them more reliable, especially between John and the Synoptics. There’s nothing that’s actually contradictory
The insane beauty of debating a religious nut is knowing that any logic can instantly be countered by them reaching into their pocket and . . . POOF! Magic.
EDIT: With that in mind, enjoy this link. Don’t bother coming back. I’ll just scoff derisively.
Lmao. You’re not serious.
I have yet to find one “contradiction” that actually holds any water. Usually it boils down to one writer describing angels as men while the other describes them as angels, or another writer mentioning details that another didn’t. If anything, it shows a lack of corroboration which makes them more reliable, especially between John and the Synoptics. There’s nothing that’s actually contradictory
The insane beauty of debating a religious nut is knowing that any logic can instantly be countered by them reaching into their pocket and . . . POOF! Magic.
EDIT: With that in mind, enjoy this link. Don’t bother coming back. I’ll just scoff derisively.
There is no god and religion is a mental illness.
Oh wow, this is it, the killer argument! 🤣
Jeebus in the brainwaves, huh?
This you?