He referenced how self hosted compilers can have malicious code as part of their binary file and how it would be impossible to detect once a backdoor had been introducedin some version.
He argues since rust people are “too political” and “actively harm non-rustaceans”, he doesn’t trust the software built by them as he is a conservative.
What are his arguments against Rust? It’s not vulnerable enough to memory-based attacks?
He referenced how self hosted compilers can have malicious code as part of their binary file and how it would be impossible to detect once a backdoor had been introducedin some version.
He argues since rust people are “too political” and “actively harm non-rustaceans”, he doesn’t trust the software built by them as he is a conservative.
This is from his video title “can we trust rust?”
“Too politicial” apparently. At least that’s what he said in the 4 minute snippet I managed to endure.
And by his definition too political means any community saying gay and trans people are normal humans and should be allowed to exist.
Not wanting to maintain a multi-language repo, and not wanting to maintain support for rust integration
Edit: I kinda assumed the guy in the pic was that kernel maintainer who kept throwing a stink about Rust code, but it’s apparently not