• I’ve given you the definition of a proof before

    You gave the defintion of one kind of proof. I’ll take that as an admission then that you can’t fault any of my proofs, since you can’t point out anything wrong with any of them, only that they don’t use the only proof method you know of, having forgotten the other proof methods that were taught to you in high school 🤣🤣🤣

    if you can’t work out why what you wrote doesn’t match

    I already know why it doesn’t match, that doesn’t make it not a proof, DUUUUHHH!!! 🤣🤣🤣 You need to go back to high school and learn about the other methods of proof that we use. You only seem to know the one you use in your little bubble.

    you just can’t do maths.

    Says person who only knows of ONE way to prove anything in Maths! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! 🤣🤣🤣

    Taken as an admission that I have indeed proved my points then, as I already knew was the case.

    That’s ok, as Barbie taught us “math is hard!”

    Is THAT why you only know ONE method of proof - you learnt from Barbie??? 🤣🤣🤣

    • FishFace@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You gave the defintion of one kind of proof.

      All mathematical proofs can be written in that form, otherwise they are not proofs. All kinds of proof are merely special cases of the general kind I told you about. You didn’t know this?? Yeesh.

      • All mathematical proofs can be written in that form, otherwise they are not proofs

        says person confirming he doesn’t know much about Mathematical proofs 🙄

        All kinds of proof are merely special cases of the general kind I told you about

        No they’re not, and you even admitted at the time that it had limitations 🙄

        You didn’t know this?? Yeesh

        Yes, I knew you only knew about one kind of proof, hence why I told you to go back to high school and re-learn all the other types that we teach to students