• MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Or more realistically be used as an excuse for always online cloud based services a la office 365. “We would let you download the app, but most users don’t have the computing power so instead we’ll just make this a helpful subscription!”

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 minutes ago

      That would still pressure the browser teams to work on memory optimizations.

      • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        “Oh don’t worry, you won’t have to actually load spreadsheets anymore, just give our AI full access to your files and it will do whatever you ask :)”

        Ideally, you’re correct though and companies start investing in optimization. I don’t see it going that way, but a girl can dream.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Honestly, it’ll be more efficient to have memory in a datacenter in that hardware in a datacenter will see higher average capacity utilization, but it’s gonna drive up datacenter prices too.

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 minutes ago

        Not sure I agree. Centralizing storage, and especially memory, creates incredible round trip costs.

      • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        As a dirty commie, I agree, but unfortunately under capitalism it is just an avenue for exploitation. Large companies are deciding what we can or cannot have access to and setting the price for it in a manner completely divorced from what they’re offering.