Cowbee uses numerous fallacies, biased sources and politician rhetoric by deliberately avoiding strong points and resorting to Mott and Baileys when backed into a corner. He ends up winning the ‘rhetoric’ war rather than the factual one because that’s really all he can afford
I honestly just made the comparison from a perception point of view. Unlike Cowbee who sugar coats and inflates his arguments just to pretend that he can be swayed. He just just overwhelms anyone who tries to point out his lies. Goat on the other hand can be swayed and is honest. He Doesn’t try to overwhelm you, can be short and concise when necessary.
I have infinitely more respect towards a person who sometimes can lose it rather than propaganda mouthpiece who writes so much that he contradicts himself frequently enough to have a schizophrenic debate with himself.
I mean you’re like their Cowbee.
Cowbee actually defends his arguments and isn’t afraid to say them when he’s in communities that disagree with him
Here’s goat doing the exact opposite: https://reddthat.com/post/58007592/24065167
Cowbee uses numerous fallacies, biased sources and politician rhetoric by deliberately avoiding strong points and resorting to Mott and Baileys when backed into a corner. He ends up winning the ‘rhetoric’ war rather than the factual one because that’s really all he can afford
I honestly just made the comparison from a perception point of view. Unlike Cowbee who sugar coats and inflates his arguments just to pretend that he can be swayed. He just just overwhelms anyone who tries to point out his lies. Goat on the other hand can be swayed and is honest. He Doesn’t try to overwhelm you, can be short and concise when necessary.
I have infinitely more respect towards a person who sometimes can lose it rather than propaganda mouthpiece who writes so much that he contradicts himself frequently enough to have a schizophrenic debate with himself.