• Funkler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Those who interviewed the witnesses:

    concluded that there were “reasonable grounds to believe that conflict-related sexual violence occurred during the October 7 attacks in multiple locations across Gaza periphery, including rape and gang rape, in at least three locations.”

    There wasn’t necessarily 3 separate occasions of gang rpe, there were at least 3 locations where either rpe or gang r*pe occured. Later on they state that it was unclear that any of this sexual violence was planned at all,

    Available evidence did not permit Human Rights Watch to draw conclusions regarding the specific identity of those who committed crimes involving sexual and gender-based, or whether these crimes were planned by the Palestinian armed groups who ordered the attacks.

    My honest assessment here is that it’s unclear how much Hamas is culpable for this. I’d encourage you to check out Norm Finkelstein’s analysis of this report and others from his interview with Robinson Erhardt. I can fully understand if you want to err on the side of caution and say that this is condemnable in the absence of some evidence that it was only the actions of individual Hamas fighters disobeying orders.

    • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      I’m always fascinated by tankies and anyone doubting women who said they were raped. What evidence will convince you if witness and victim testimony, video footage of women being stripped, autopsies, confessions from captured terrorists, and the UN stating that there was rape, will not convince you?