• MoonMelon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    3 days ago

    TFW you live in a galaxy-spanning super civilization but your planet is dying because its ID in the central database has a UUID collision with another planet 80000 light years away.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well, the UUIDs for almost everything we use are galaxy-scale already. Astronomers just need to up those random letters a bit.

    • Gork@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      How difficult would it be for every single thing that can be cataloged and named in the known universe to have a sufficiently unique UUID?

      • atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        according to wikipedia, there are about 10⁸⁰ protons in the observable universe

        you would need 266 bits to give each one a different number
        if you are using base 64, you would need 45 digits
        it would look something like this aGVoc3Z4ZnN5YWhkYiByaHNqc2hyIGcgZGhzaGVkaGJz1

      • MoonMelon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        IDK, it’s fun to think about because maybe the 128 bit UUID is still being used due to 40k-like levels of technical debt, and also weird edge cases that cause ID explosion. Like maybe the 4000 year old spec says we need to track micrometeoroids too, sorry.

  • bryndos@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    After the generations of repeated offence to the Betelgeusish by earthlings trying to pronounce the native name for their home star, it’s probably for the best.

    “I seem to be having this tremendous difficulty with my lifestyle”

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    To be fair, we don’t have any pics of exoplanets. Technically, we could measure their surface temperature and basic chemistry through spectroscoopy but I don’t think they reflect enough photons for our equipment. They are usually identified by dimming their star slightly when passing in front of it. This can give an estimated size and distance from their star. And maybe atmosphere composition if it refracts! So they’re not naming this kind of picture but a bunch of data with big error bars.

  • TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Jokes aside, I’m sure there is SOME method for how they name what they find; I highly doubt they just use a random number generator. Does anyone here know what that process is?