0ops@piefed.zip to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 hours agoOverbearing datetime pickersmessage-squaremessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up184arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up184arrow-down1message-squareOverbearing datetime pickers0ops@piefed.zip to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 hours agomessage-square16fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarebleistift2@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 hours ago can you elaborate on type=“datetime-local” not existing? Oh goddamn, I hate web standards sometimes. There used to be a proposal for datetime-local, but it was dropped, even though some browsers already supported it. That’s what I meant. However, some years later the W3C added it to the standard again. More info: https://webmasters.stackexchange.com/a/59541 https://stackoverflow.com/a/22654498/
minus-squarePika@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-24 hours agoThank you for expanding on it. That was a pretty interesting read, gotta love indecisiveness in your standards
Oh goddamn, I hate web standards sometimes.
There used to be a proposal for datetime-local, but it was dropped, even though some browsers already supported it. That’s what I meant.
However, some years later the W3C added it to the standard again.
More info: https://webmasters.stackexchange.com/a/59541 https://stackoverflow.com/a/22654498/
Thank you for expanding on it. That was a pretty interesting read, gotta love indecisiveness in your standards