• Kairus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Plus, 2nd image, the poses don’t match the incline, and 3rd image the heads and tails are weird

      • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        First image is literally 7 years old. You can investigate the others to prove they’re AI if you really want, but I’m not chasing down every false alarm.

        • No_Eponym@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          As I replied elsewhere, wrong, the first image is clearly derived from a 7 year old image but is not that image. This is AI garbage.

    • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Could also be climbing and at a funny angle, could be licking minerals (a common reason for goats to climb).

      I can’t imagine there’s a lot of training data for mountain goats, especially climbing at weird angles, which is part of why I think this likely isn’t AI generated.

      • No_Eponym@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Does no one know how to enlarge images anymore? This is clearly AI slop, just zoom in on them it is painfully obvious as the

        • background goat in the first photo has no head and is stuck in the wall up to their shoulders.
        • both goats in the second image have extra horns or a leg tail or some random white fluff coming out of their face
        • both goats in the third image are just approximations of goats blurred together
          • No_Eponym@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Wrong again! The image you linked is not the first image, but clearly is the source of the training for the AI image.

            See

            • different goat face position, eye, colouring
            • missing goats at the bottom left of the image
            • completely different cliff face

            Since these deficiencies are obvious and anyone can see them, that leaves Lemmings to ask, why are you defending this? Are you

            • trolling?
            • karma farming?
            • a bot?

            Cause your defence of this is as fake as the AI images in the meme and muddies the waters, supporting breaking Rule 5 of this community. Why do you support AI slop when it is against the rules?

            • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I’m a guy on my phone with one good eye doing my best to see what I’m looking at. You could have taken the opportunity to consider there are people not looking at this with 4k on a giant screen, but calling me a bot for thinking those were the same image on a phone is probably more reasonable 🙄

              Since it is slop, yeah, mods should delete it. Go through my post history if you want to see how much of an AI stan I am, lmao.

              • Kairus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 hours ago

                I second guessed myself, and had to look back-and-forth at those images on phone. Calling you a bot/troll for this in isolation is a pretty unreasonable leap