• its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It’s devoid of context, but it could just be talking about the people who only just now have begun believing despite the voices of the victims.

    • Totally Human Emdash User@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The post makes it seem like this was a typical perspective, though. I get that womens’ voices are generally not taken seriously enough when it comes to this kind of thing, but if there were one exception to this rule then Epstein seemed to be it because in my experience everyone considered him to be a dirtbag even before the files were released. Have I just been unwittingly sheltered when it comes to peoples’ views on Epstein? (Genuine question.)

      • its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I wouldn’t call it unwittingly sheltered. More like programed by right-wing media to never trust the victim when women step forward.

        • Totally Human Emdash User@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 minutes ago

          Have I [emphasis mine] just been unwittingly sheltered when it comes to peoples’ views on Epstein? (Genuine question.)

          I wouldn’t call it unwittingly sheltered. More like programed by right-wing media to never trust the victim when women step forward.

          That is a peculiar thing to say about me.

          • its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            23 minutes ago

            I’m sorry I misread your comment. I thought it was speaking generally not you specific. That comment was directed towards the people who are just now coming around and or the ones who are still stubbornly refusing to see the reason.