Self-driving cars are often marketed as safer than human drivers, but new data suggests that may not always be the case.

Citing data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Electrek reports that Tesla disclosed five new crashes involving its robotaxi fleet in Austin. The new data raises concerns about how safe Tesla’s systems really are compared to the average driver.

The incidents included a collision with a fixed object at 17 miles per hour, a crash with a bus while the Tesla vehicle was stopped, a crash with a truck at four miles per hour, and two cases where Tesla vehicles backed into fixed objects at low speeds.

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 minutes ago

    They’ll work perfectly as soon as AI space data center robots go to Mars. I’d say a Robovan will be able to tow a roadster from New York to Hong Kong by… probably July. July or November at the latest.

    • slevinkelevra@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yeah that’s well known by now. However, safety through additional radar sensors costs money and they can’t have that.

      • tomalley8342@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        60 minutes ago

        Nah, that one’s on Elon just being a stubborn bitch and thinking he knows better than everybody else (as usual).

        • ageedizzle@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 minutes ago

          He’s right in that if current AI models were genuinely intelligent in the way humans are then cameras would be enough to achieve at least human level driving skills. The problem of course is that AI models are not nearly at that level yet

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I don’t think it’s necessarily about cost. They were removing sensors both before costs rose and supply became more limited with things like the tariffs.

        Too many sensors also causes issues, adding more is not an easy fix. Sensor Fusion is a notoriously difficult part of robotics. It can help with edge cases and verification, but it can also exacerbate issues. Sensors will report different things at some point. Which one gets priority? Is a sensor failing or reporting inaccurate data? How do you determine what is inaccurate if the data is still within normal tolerances?

        More on topic though… My question is why is the robotaxi accident rate different from the regular FSD rate? Ostensibly they should be nearly identical.

      • paraphrand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        just one more AI model, please, that’ll do it, just one more, just you wait, have you seen how fast things are improving? Just one more. Common, just one more…

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I mean, people are dying. Including the people who didn’t pay for it. So, kind of a bigger deal than that.