• SomeLemmyUser@discuss.tchncs.deOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Good question, can’t answer that as I’m not an accelerationist.

    I dont think a collapse happens not by itself in such a case, but by civil rights groups, socialists, anarchists, workers and ordinary people bringing it down. It will depend on them to build a better system.

    My vote would go to democratic socialism, but most societal systems would be better than the most powerful nation being a facist system imho

    • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah, a controlled collapse led by my preferred party who then lead the new society into my perfect system sounds awesome.

        • SomeLemmyUser@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Jup, that’s why personality cult sucks. Can’t wait for the easy fix that humans seem to like it, even if they know its bad. Evolutionary I guess, we tend to personify.

      • SomeLemmyUser@discuss.tchncs.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Well speaking historically if a system needed a fundamental change (revolutionary one might say) it seems that doing such changes in rather short time and rather drastically has worked better than incremental change

      • SomeLemmyUser@discuss.tchncs.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Well I would be happy with another system to if we decide so trough fair discourse as a society. Maybe I am naiv, but i consider facism as the bad end of the spectrum as far as societal systems go, most stuff is better even if its not my preferred utopia.