As it stands right now, it looks like we have to just judge based off of how old posts are to see if we can still interact with a community.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 小时前

    You mean like if there’s a community called !cats@example.com and your home instance no longer federates with the instance example.com?

    If so, I’ll add that to Tesseract as it sounds useful.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 小时前

      this would be an amazing addition! It would help avoid the disconnect between de-federated instances/communities

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 小时前

      Are you the creator of Tesseract? I love it except it doesn’t save my settings or my favorites and multi-communities. I’m not sure why and I’ve checked in the last 2 weeks. It’s been doing it a long time.

  • ozoned@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 小时前

    Bonfire just instituted a “Federated” flag in their alpha. I think this could be useful.

  • Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 小时前

    The best tool I know of is the Federation Checker, but something like it should definitely should be built into clients.

    Notably, Beehaw is defederated from .world and sh.itjust.works, while dbzer0, quokk.au, and anarchist.nexus are defederated from feddit.org.

    • yo_scottie_oh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 小时前

      That’s a handy tool, thanks for posting it. Do you happen to know how the lists are sorted? It’s not alphabetical.

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 小时前

      Make sure you visit in a browser aince apps wouldn’t have implemented an in development feature.