Ranked voting. Fined heavily if you don’t. Politicians need to reveal their donors and sponsorships and lobbyists at the start of every speech like a YouTube reviewer does when they receive something for free. We shouldn’t need sites that reveal who is owned by AIPAC, etc.
Ranked voting. Fined heavily if you don’t. Politicians need to reveal their donors and sponsorships and lobbyists at the start of every speech like a YouTube reviewer does when they receive something for free. We shouldn’t need sites that reveal who is owned by AIPAC, etc.
OP asked for the most controversial. You listed a few. Which do you think is most controversial?
Forget ranked voting.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority_judgment
This suffers from low explainability, so score voting is better imo.
Interesting. Will read up on this.