Sharing is ethical only through corporate approved channels!

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyzOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    More to the point, why would they?

    Why wouldn’t they want more direct control over how content is shared online? They control essentially the only web browser and the internet is more centralized under a few corporations than it ever has been…

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Well because it would be akin to taking away the ability to right click from an operating system. It’s been basic functionality for many years and would enrage hundreds of millions of users and drive them to another browser over night.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Firefox, one of its forks, or one of the up and coming ones. Or webkit based ones. Or if on apple, safari.

          • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyzOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Are you comfortable actually pointing to those as realistic alternatives for most everybody?

            I see endless rows of corporate silos and a couple of niche little hobbiest communities off to the side, I do not see an environment where corporations can’t do whatever the hell they want.

            Don’t get me wrong, I hope I am wrong, but I don’t think I am.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Absolutely yes. I would recommend Firefox to any and every person complaining about chrome. And for times they have to use chrome, there are alternatives that do various amounts of degoogling. Almost certainly one would be able to reinstate copy/paste.