• ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Deceptive marketing. The 80 lb model is the budget model, but the picture shows the much fancier 300 lb model.

    • radix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Solid stainless steel at that weight would be roughly 17 cm per side (assuming a cube), depending on the exact alloy.

      There’s no perfect reference scale, but the diagonal width of the cube is 60% the width of the drawer (by pixels). My kitchen drawer measures 40.5 cm, so the cube is some 24.5 cm across diagonally. A 17 cm cube would be just over 24 cm. I did a lot of rounding at every step, but it seems to check out pretty darn well.

    • Godort@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Yeah, they switched production methods in the 90s to save on manufacturing costs.

      Back in the 70s they were made from solid steel