Apple appears to have prematurely revealed the name of its rumored lower-cost MacBook model, which is expected to be announced this Wednesday. A regulatory document for a “MacBook Neo” (Model A3404) has appeared on Apple’s website. Unfortunately, there are no further details or images available yet. While the PDF file does not contain the “MacBook Neo” name, it briefly appeared in a link on Apple’s regulatory website for EU compliance purposes.

  • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Then don’t buy one. Idk why people get so offended when a company releases a product they’re not personally interested in.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I have no intention of buying one.

      People get offended when customers are swindled. And Apple are expert swindlers.

      Aside from that, the choices other people make affect your choices available on the market. No better example than the headphone jack. Apple removes it and people scream DONT BUY IT IF YOU DONT LIKE IT, ignorant of the fact that not only this an option that’s no longer available, but that the market as a whole would follow Apple’s greedy lead until the only thing left is a handful of budget devices, for inexplicable reasons.

      • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        People get offended when customers are swindled. And Apple are expert swindlers.

        So it’s a case of “everyone’s stupid except for me”?

        No better example than the headphone jack.

        Incredibly vocal minority on reddit/Lemmy aside, your average consumer doesn’t give a shit about having a 3.5 jack in their phone. The market prefers thinner, lighter, and better waterproofing. Know how I know? Because if there was a big market for a phone with a 3.5 jack, someone would be making it, and lots of people would be buying it. It’s not saving these companies a ton on manufacturing to not include one. They cost pennies each when purchased in bulk.

        • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Know how I know? Because if there was a big market for a phone with a 3.5 jack, someone would be making it, and lots of people would be buying it.

          that’s not how it works, so I’d argue you don’t know… as Jobs said, he’ll tell you what you want.

          • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Jobs is dead, had been dead for 5 years when apple removed the 3.5 jack, and was never in charge of the myriad other phone manufacturers who also removed their 3.5 jacks. I’m not sure he’s as relevant here as you’re implying.

            Anyway, as an adult, “company made a product that isn’t catered to my specific preferences” is well below my threshold for outrage. I actually can’t imagine living like that. It must be horrible.

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          So it’s a case of “everyone’s stupid except for me”?

          No, lots of other people also understand that they’re swindlers.

          your average consumer doesn’t give a shit about having a 3.5 jack in their phone

          Whoosh. It wasn’t about “the average consumer”, it’s about why people are upset about trends in a market, even if it’s not something they would ever buy.

          It’s not saving these companies a ton on manufacturing to not include one. They cost pennies each when purchased in bulk.

          LOL you actually thought this ever had anything to do with saving money? Did you not notice that they also released another product simultaneously that now makes enough money on its own to be a Fortune 500 company? They created a problem and then immediately turned around and sold people a solution. Absolute masterclass in swindling.

          • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            No, lots of other people also understand that they’re swindlers.

            And lots of other people like their stuff and might want to buy this. I’m not one of them, but I’m happy they can get something they like. Why isn’t that good enough?

            It wasn’t about “the average consumer”

            It’s absolutely about the average consumer. Do you honestly believe Samsung removed the 3.5 jack simply because apple did and they’re conditioned to follow apple? They follow money. The money is in thinner, lighter, and better water resistance. The money is there because that’s what the average consumer actually wants.

            Did you not notice that they also released another product simultaneously that now makes enough money on its own to be a Fortune 500 company?

            And how does that help the competing manufacturers who also removed their 3.5 jack?