okr765
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Innerworld@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 hours ago

OpenAI Is Developing an Alternative To GitHub

www.reuters.com

external-link
message-square
18
fedilink
12
external-link

OpenAI Is Developing an Alternative To GitHub

www.reuters.com

Innerworld@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 hours ago
message-square
18
fedilink
reuters.com
www.reuters.com
external-link
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • BladeFederation@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 hours ago

    “What could be worse than MICROSOFT overseeing open source software? Wait no! It was a rhetorical question!”

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I hope they call it “SlopTrough”

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Ew

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Was self-hosting gitlab or foregejo not an option?

    • apostrofail@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      deleted by creator

    • DrCake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      17 hours ago

      They’ll probably just fork forgejo add some slight “ai agentic” bullshit and market it as their own product.

      I was going to say hopefully the forgejo licence doesn’t allow that but then again, OpenAI have shown they don’t really care about copyright or anything like that

      • Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Forgejo is licensed under GPLv3, so I think it isn’t possible to do so

        • Melusine@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
          link
          fedilink
          Français
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Correct me if I wrong, but the GPL has the weakpoint of web distribution in the sense that a backend is not shipped to the client, so you can keep a forked GPL product without publishing back. The AGPL was made for this (and the SSPL (I think) is like any network interface needed should be published too).

    • mrmaplebar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It was but then how could they pitch that to investors?

    • etchinghillside@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Those aren’t “agentic” enough.

  • halfapage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    18 hours ago

    im tired boss

  • Casterial@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Why? Seems like a massive waste of resources. We already have several source controls

    • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Wasting resources is literally AI’s main thing

      • Casterial@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Lol true 😂

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Github is not source control

      • Casterial@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        No, but there are so many other systems already out there that compete with it. Why reinvent the wheel when your company is already bleeding billions?

        • Joelk111@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Gotta keep throwing shit at the wall.

  • gilokee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    !fuck_ai@lemmy.world

  • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    NIH

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @L4s@lemmy.world
  • @autotldr@lemmings.world
  • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks
  • @wikibot@lemmy.world
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 4.32K users / day
  • 9.92K users / week
  • 17.2K users / month
  • 30K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 82.3K subscribers
  • 13.3K Posts
  • 490K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Technopagan@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@lemmy.world
  • L3s@hackingne.ws
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org