Assuming I’m assuming the 282 unidentified dogs were all pitbulls is the most batshit strawman you could’ve taken away from what I said.

I don’t even know if “strawman” applies, though; you might be illiterate enough to have actually read it that way. The obvious reading is that I was jokingly preempting you trying to use the 282 unidentified dogs to weasel your way into a “God of the gaps”-style argument to assert some bias against pitbulls in identification so major that it invalidates the argument.