Nah. Stupid is “button mashing” with no intent. Professionally stupid is button mashing cover and equipping a weapon while switching to third person thereby storing your coordinates so that when you re-enter first person it moves you to those stored coordinates. If you lock your coordinates on an inside map then re-enter first person outside it moves you to the center of the map. That’s how speed runners beat the game on 40 minutes.
I think I remember seeing a game where if you shot with a sniper rifle, and switched to knife right after, you’d “become the bullet” and get projected to stab the distant enemy (or something similar, I don’t recall exactly what/how). That’s the kind of bugs that are fcking hilarious.
This might be the best description of a good game QA that I’ve ever read
Given most AI are trained on datasets mined from the deepest public cesspits of the internet… that is a bet I’d be wary of making.
Nah. Stupid is “button mashing” with no intent. Professionally stupid is button mashing cover and equipping a weapon while switching to third person thereby storing your coordinates so that when you re-enter first person it moves you to those stored coordinates. If you lock your coordinates on an inside map then re-enter first person outside it moves you to the center of the map. That’s how speed runners beat the game on 40 minutes.
I think I remember seeing a game where if you shot with a sniper rifle, and switched to knife right after, you’d “become the bullet” and get projected to stab the distant enemy (or something similar, I don’t recall exactly what/how). That’s the kind of bugs that are fcking hilarious.
That’s the kind of incomprehensible thinking AI is best at
Then please, show us an example of AI doing effective QA, should be trivial!