• jol@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I haven’t found a company that enforces windows of everyone. Seems ridiculous. I would sign the contract then simply require a Mac because I don’t know how to use Windows. IT be dammed.

    • plz1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I recently quit a company that does. They hid that until after I accepted and started. I quit out of frustration after a couple weeks of having to listen the the fan all day due to their surveillance and telemetry running. They even disabled sleep mode, so you either had to leave that thing phoning home 24/7, or forcibly shut down every day. 10 minute boot time on a brand new laptop.

    • wasabi@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Smaller companies, maybe. But bigger companies will have a ‘Security and Compliance’ department which will force everyone to use a company-supported platform. It goes beyond OS too. Unapproved apps, even if you are allowed to install them, may not connect to company resources.

      • Mikina@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Managing centralized security and device management correctly on multiple OSes must be a nightmare. From EDRs to app and device provisioning.

        You should do dev work in devcontainers anyway.

        Not that it’s an excuse or that I’m happy with that, but I can totally understand why companies do that, and tbh I’d rather see a properly secured than have the option to run Linux.

        But I’m biased, because I used to do Red Teamings, and the things I’ve seen…

        • pivot_root@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          27 minutes ago

          You should do dev work in devcontainers anyway.

          Devcontainers work for Visual Studio Code when developers are more than happy to click their way through running builds and debugging problems. But, as someone whose workflow is optimized for the command-line, they can fuck off.

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        for a senior engineer position though? That seems counterproductive. I would expect it of one of the entry levels or non-it but forcing a windows ecosystem on a development or engineering sector screams red flag to me.

        • Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          A senior engineer obviously needs (and knows how to handle) considerably more access to their workstation and company IT infrastructure than the average employee. On the other hand, I’ve occasionally read complaints from IT security types about engineers being way to eager too install sketchy stuff.

          There’s some truth to those complaints. I might need to try out several libraries and tools to see what works best for a certain use case. Is that new one with 15 stars on Github actually safe? Are all of its dependencies? How many developers perform a task like that in a sandbox? How many of those perform a thorough audit before taking it out of the sandbox?