Yes, obviously AI is emitting way too much. It shouldn’t even be producing 0.2% of global emissions, let alone 2%. My main grievance is that no one ever talks about improving industrial and agricultural processes even though they produce around 29% of emissions and 20% of emissions respectively.

  • PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Well in the agricultural sense the only thing we can do is to make more people vegetarian (not really happening)/and make more affordable plant based milk. The latter one is actually in here already! I’ve seen plant based milks not that much more expensive than a cow’s milk in Hungary.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      15 hours ago

      to make more people vegetarian

      You don’t necessarily need people to go full vegetarian. Just eating less meat is a much easier sell. If 2 people eat 1/2 as much meat as they otherwise would, that’s just as good as 1 person going full vegetarian.

      The type of meat also matters. Beef is much higher in greenhouse gas emissions than any other type of meat. So if you just switch beef for, say, chicken or pork, you’re already doing a lot better.

    • saturn57@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      While switching to plant based food is an obvious course of action which would have drastic benefits, several other methods exist by which agricultural emissions. These include:

      • Livestock diet changes to reduce methane production
      • More accurate fertilizer application to reduce nitrous oxide production
      • Draining rice paddies to reduce production of methane by anaerobic microbes
      • No till farming to allow more carbon to be stored in the soil
      • Farm equipment electrification
      • Crops bred for higher yield or lower resource usage