• EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    pick photos and determine what they’re into.

    Why not do things the old fashioned way and just ask? Almost like a survey or something.

    • winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Cause that way only harvests a small piece of data you willingly submit and could be wrong. Harvesting someone’s entire gallery is way more info to use and sell

  • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Tinder scanning my photo library, reading my diary and social media. Then it automatically generates perfect pictures and text for my dating profile. Then an AI bot looks at profiles for me and chats with other AI bots to set up dates. It then automatically adds a date to my calendar and makes a reservation in a restaurant. Nice.

    • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Honestly, that sounds like a great experience.

      It might actually lead to a relationship though, so there’s no way Tinder will make it so easy.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Oh yeah, it takes out all the humanity put of the dating experience, so that you can just focus on the transactional sex.

        And all it costs you is ALL of your privacy

        Burn it to the ground

    • _g_be@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Leads to my favorite punchline/rebuttal combo “do you need the robot to fuck your wife for you too?”

  • Charlxmagne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    “Plans”? A bit late to the fucking party mate, google, fapple, meta/koobface have been doing that shit for years 🤦‍♂️

  • Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Every day I thank the Gods for having met my partner, and no longer needing to use dating apps is a huge part of it.

    Anyway, does the word “enshittification” even make sense when the service was already shit to begin with? How do we even refer to a move like this? “Shittiness diversification”?

  • ToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 hours ago

    So when my tinder AI meets and dates another person’s AI, openAI will send me the bill for their AI wedding, then when the divorce comes, they’ll sue for half of my real life stuff?

    Neat.

    • officermike@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Not to detract from graphene, but stock Android can let you manage what specific pictures each app has access to. I don’t trust Meta with full access to my gallery, so anytime I have to upload something to Whatsapp, I have to specifically grant permission for that photo to Whatsapp.

      • Semperverus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Fun fact, that functionality literally came from GrapheneOS. Google onboarded it from Graphene.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Orrrrrr, you could, and hear me out…NOT use products from argueably THE biggest invader of privacy of our times. You could just use another messanger.

          • Zombie@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Your employer owes you a phone if they want you to use software that they specify.

            • cole@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              probably not a realistic take, even if I agree with it.

              Whatsapp is so popular that if you’re outside of the US the expectation is not weird

            • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              I had a shit employer, I’m normally self-employed but I took a job one winter, they wanted me to download some app called Deputy to like spy on me 24/7. I never did.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Android and iOS also have guardrails around this. The OS asks for user consent and the user can grant no access or limited access.

      Limited access, which is what you’ll want for a dating app that requires photo sharing, has been in iOS since 2020 (iOS 14). Android has been doing it since 2022 (Android 13).

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Psh, I use GOS without Storage Scopes. I simply only take flattering photographs of my Adonis-like form (they’re swiping left anyway, smh)

  • jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    12 hours ago

    This is a horrible idea and everyone involved in its conception and implementation should be barred from working in technology ever again.

  • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Lol, good. The user’s of all ‘mainstream’ social networks, for dating or not, should be fine with that.