• Gladaed@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Destroying a public Ressource/Wiki you contributed to. For example if you contribute to Wikipedia in the past and disagree with their firmly held belief that climate change is a scientific fact and then try to remove the lines you contributed you would very clearly be in the wrong.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You’re using a non-profit knowledge sharing organization as an example in a discussion about Reddit, which is quite the opposite.

      • Gladaed@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I don’t believe they wrote their post to further reddits valuation, but to help their fellow man.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I definitely agree with you there.

          Reddit, unfortunately, does not. I am not suggesting that Reddit’s bad intentions necessarily make removing one’s past contributions a good thing or a necessity – but I do understand why folks might do it.

          Vandalism does still feel like the wrong label though. With Reddit you are the sole creator and controller of your comments and their contents (except mod/admin actions, of course) at all times. And even though those comments are part of a larger structured collection of comments, it still isn’t like a Wikipedia edit or a contribution to the Linux kernel, where a multitude of other individuals have to approve the change and can edit the exact same spot in the future.

          You are definitely taking stuff away from your fellow man, and it may be a net negative for humanity, but it is still at least YOUR stuff that you are sabotaging. Usually messing up your own stuff isn’t called vandalism. I think that’s why we jumped on that word.

          When you try to sabotage a wikipedia page or some FOSS project, that is OUR stuff that you’re sabotaging, even if you created that part originally.

          That was probably too much text to try to describe the manner in which I am splitting this hair, lol.