• 0 Posts
  • 1.16K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 8th, 2023

help-circle








  • Zink@programming.devto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneGayonnaise
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    That jar reminds me of the end result of the sand ceremony that some people do at weddings. Several years ago I photographed a wedding for a middle aged couple who each already had kids, so with their Brady Bunch situation I think they had even more colors than this.

    So uh, are any of you lovely gay Lemmings planning on getting hitched with your partner any time soon? I know the perfect container for a sand ceremony that you would display in your home for decades to celebrate your love AND your sense of humor.




  • Oh it gets even weirder than that.

    One observer can see two events happen simultaneously while another sees them happen at different times.

    And EVEN WORSE than that, thanks to length contraction at relativistic speeds, you could have one observer think that a train is contained entirely within a tunnel, but another observer sees the train sticking out both ends of the tunnel at the same time without ever fitting entirely within it.

    and/or: One observer objectively masures that object A is longer than object B, while another observer objectively measures that object B is longer than object A.

    The two observers are not just hanging out together, of course. They are moving ridiculously fast relative to one another.

    The speed of causality is a hell of a drug.



  • I think the word “relatively” in the previous comment is doing some heavy lifting.

    If you are going to spend a few hours of your limited free time to plant the shrubs, even if the materials and transportation are free to you, compare that with the relative cost of a small environmental fine to a trillion dollar company building a billion dollar data center.

    The people at the top might not even realize anything happened, if anything even does happen.




  • It’s that way with Webb since it focuses on infrared, but I thought hubble used the visible spectrum.

    After a brief search, it looks like Hubble uses the entire optical spectrum which includes some IR and UV along with visible. It depends on the specific image, but the deep field stuff looks like it was a combination of visible and IR, which makes sense considering red shift. But the bluer objects were captured in the visible.

    So they inevitably had to compress the spectrum for the photos, but speaking as somebody who has taken tens of thousands of photos in RAW format, all the colors in every photo are translated data. :) (that also goes for the screen displaying the final image using a mix of three wavelengths rather than the actual colors of the original light)