• Fair Fairy@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    So here is the thing.
    U lost. The moment I need American people to bail you out, you need to treat American people way way the fuck better.

    Worker rights, mandatory vacations, work protections, pensions, guaranteed healthcare etc.

  • thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    So they dont care about making cars for the world market, they just want regulations to allow them to milk the american market…

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Dam maybe some of the American automakers who took billions in subsidies should have built cheaper cars instead of the largest trucks possible to skirt regulations.

    I literally can’t afford an American car, i can afford a BYD tho.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    The same thing happened in the 80s with Japan. The Japanese were no longer making crappy cars but small and very reliable, affordable cars. Detroit was still making rust buckets, obsessing over powerful engines with bodies that rotted out and defects galore. Detroit got beaten up badly (Chrysler had to get a gov bailout) until they cleaned up their act and improved their products. Protecting Detroit from competition would’ve just saddled US consumers with decades more of crappy, overpriced, low quality, cars.

    https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/how-detroits-automakers-went-from-kings-of-the-road-to-roadkill/

    We still don’t let in the small pickups the rest of the world enjoys.

    • Waffle@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 minutes ago

      I would kill for a small electric truck… Telo is calling my name, but they don’t have a functioning product yet.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      defects galore

      A friend of mine from high school attended the GM Institute and became an engineer for them. One of his first projects was on a team that bought a Lexus and an Infiniti when they first came on the market and took them apart to see how many production defects they had. He said a typical American car at the time (and this was in the '90s after quality had rebounded somewhat from its disastrous nadir) had 300-400 defects. The Infiniti they took apart had 2. The Lexus had 0.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    When Americans of all political stripes finally wake up to global realty, they’ll most likely do it lying on a sidewalk, naked in the rain, with their fingers in their ears saying na-na-na-na-na-na…

    People will eventually have to face that the economic golden age of the 1950s and 60s wasn’t a normal state we can return to if greedy billionaires just let us. The rich definitely grabbed the biggest share of the prosperity, but that brief era of prosperity wasn’t normal, it was entirely abnormal, and it’s been over for quite a while. We’ve been fooling ourselves and keeping it going for the last half century by living on credit, and that’s about to end. I don’t know what new era is about to start, but the American era is over.

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I don’t give two cents for the american auto brands but spare me the drama: try and make a proper car.

    Looking at Ford: try importing a few models from the european line and offer it in the states. Small, economic, somewhat reliable, fuel efficient cars.

    Stellantis has a slew of models that could be brought into the american market. They make good cars.

    And I’m willing to bet GM as a few models they build and market overseas that would be guaranteed sucesses.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Uh, to be clear, I don’t think Michael Dunne is advocating against China in this context. He worked in the Chinese auto sector for decades. He isn’t an alarmist, he’s their salesman.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      What Ford European line? They discontinued the Mondeo and their minivans. Now it’s hatch or crappy SUV. Or Mustang. Oh wait. Focus is end of life too now. It’s mustang or crappy crossover SUVs only.

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Not enough Americans will buy small euro cars. Do you seriously think they wouldn’t just do that if they could justify the cost of switching off a f150 assembly line to make a small car they would. Ford and Chevy both had a ton of small cars throughout the years but the sales aren’t there anymore.

      • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Ford stopped making cars because they can’t compete with the current crop of cars coming from Japan/Korea and Europe regardless of how much money they throw at the problem. They have their niche with trucks and SUVs and are happy to stay there. China builds cars using massive government subsidies, slave labor, and local resources that aren’t available to anyone else in the world which is why I think it’s right to fight against them because it’s impossible to compete against them just like a small local grocery store can’t compete against Walmart.

      • AlexLost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You are wrong. American manufacturers are captured by the oil conglomerates to sell fuel. That’s why you have giant behemoths barrelling down the highways. F150s have almost doubled in size over the last two decades.

  • kemsat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Maybe the USA should heavily invest in the industry of the USA, just like China does, in order to keep up? No, then USian companies would have oversight & have to meet expectations, and we all know that they wouldn’t want that.

    • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That would require companies roll profits back into development and their employees instead of pocketing it all, schemes like stock buybacks and wall st traders.

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I hate that the US is like this. People would EASILY pay more for American if the quality was there. But ffs they don’t even try anymore. They just make slop and expect us to pay more for it.

      • kemsat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Which sucks because I did use to think that “Made in the USA” meant better quality.

    • derpgon@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Also labor price is unmatched. Nobody would work for the wage they give to children in China, so you can’t really go that much cheaper while not sacrificing safety.

      Not saying Chinese cars are that well made.

      • Flagg76@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Very few children work in china right now, Chinese workers even have 5 days of vacation a year by law.

        That’s 5 more than the US…

        There were probably more children working on farms in the US than in china, and I remember something about Florida wanting to reinstate child labour again?

      • kemsat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That’s true, but we could subsidize the cost of labor too. People make a living wage, but the company pays less than that because government covers the difference.

      • Almacca@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        They’re being pretty ruthless about grabbing all the world’s resources to make them as well.

        • Flagg76@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          No the rest of the world has been sleeping when China silently bought all the mines and harbors in the past decades.

          • iridebikes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            If our CEOs and business leaders are supposedly the world’s best, why didn’t they spent their capital shutting China down instead of their lavish lifestyles and payouts for their wealthy stockholders? I guess they aren’t as good at running businesses as they claim to be.

      • Dearth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        China has compulsory education for children just like America. There’s no child labor in China.

        They pay adult workers less in China, but these yuan has 7x buying power than the dollar in China

        • derpgon@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          That’s what Chinese propagandists want you to think, there are way more people living in (borderline) poverty (per capita) than in the US.

          Social media is being fed with a slice of mainland China, but anything beyond that is people struggling to keep ends meet.

  • zeca@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    8 hours ago

    So when can we stop with this “free markets” nonsense in the third world aswell??

    • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      There hasn’t every been a free market. Its a captive market. When you can only succeed by denying a competitor into a market you prove that. They refuse to rise to the challenge because they don’t have to.

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Have you seen those byd cars on YouTube. Their mid price cars look like high end Mercedes over here. Meanwhile Ford and Chevy will sell you a $75000 pickup with all plastic interior.

      None of the legacy companies are competing. Ever. The best we can hope for is rivian and other new players filling the gap.

      • Dave.@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’ve test driven a few BYD models here in Australia. 50 thousand dollarydoos for an electric car that goes 400+km, can power your house in a blackout, has all the normal electric car performance (6 seconds to 100kmhr) and is chock full of user comforts and safety features.

        There are a LOT of these getting around in Brisbane, and for good reason. I didn’t get one this time round, but by the time the lease expires on my Volvo EX30 in 4 years, I’ll be looking pretty hard at BYD. Especially if they get their new solid state batteries going by then.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The income stream would disappear, their operations would collapse and that would just be the end. There would not be another manufacturer that would flourish in the void left behind. Without the institutional know how and the existing structure, supply chain the current car manufacturing industry would never be able to restart if it ever stopped.

      The social darwinism of the globalist free market is meant for crushing the spirit and bargaining power of individual workers, they are replaceable, disposable, interchangeable. General Motors and Ford aren’t.

      • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I think that’s kind of the point. What the current case industry is doing is getting them smoked. They need to let go of the past the “institutional knowledge” that’s exactly why Ford and Chevy won’t compete with Chinese EV. Those are built from the ground up for the modern era with modern leadership modern supply chains building institutional knowledge that matters today and into the future. I would love nothing more than to drive a Ford EV. I am considering the f150 lightning but in comparison to things I see online it’s really far behind.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          43 minutes ago

          The problem is the world is transitioning to EVs, and burying your head in the sand won’t change that. Legacy manufacturers could be trying to find their place in the new world while they can, or they can stick with technology of the past, let someone else come to dominate the new technologies, and be left with a ever shrinking market until they disappear

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Well they’d have to cut c-suite and shareholder’s cut because everything else that could be squeezed out has already been squeezed out, so the c-suite and shareholder will convert their money into the political power it takes to just block out the competition.

  • wosat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I don’t disagree with the criticisms of American cars – overpriced, uninspired, unreliable, over-engineered, etc. – but to everyone saying “we should just compete”, do you realize the realities that Chinese workers experience? Have you heard of 996? It’s shorthand for a common work schedule in China: 9am to 9pm, 6 days a week. Benefits that are common in the U.S., even in non-union shops, like retirement plans, PTO, worker’s comp, and overtime pay are rare. So, yeah, things can be made much cheaper if you are willing to feed your workforce into the grinder.

    • jarmitage@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      And that’s exactly what is coming to the US, since they think workers rights and unions are the problem.

        • Komodo Rodeo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Not an American, but it’s worth saying that despite their labour market’s galling shortfalls, they don’t have a culture of 12 hour days for 6 days per week. Many work much less, and those who do pull those kinds of hours are typically tradesmen/women who make pretty good bank. Those types of jobs are being systematically eliminated by corporations, but I digress.

    • Horsey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I will strongly disagree with “over engineered”. Why a car company with all their money and bailouts that they can’t compete with Apple/Android on touchscreen features and responsiveness is the whole reason why Chinese cars will kill American car companies. Chinese cars support Android auto even when Google play services isn’t even available in China (last I checked).

      • wosat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Okay, I’ll concede that point to you. U.S. carmakers suck at software. And, even on the hardware, they’re resistant to change and slow to innovate.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      So we should then let American oligarchs drive American workers to the same but slower? because that is what has happened so far

      • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 hours ago

        That is certainly their wet dream, now that they can’t easily just move their manufacturing to China and reap all of the benefits like they could 70s - 90s.

    • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      but to everyone saying “we should just compete”, do you realize the realities that Chinese workers experience? Have you heard of 996?

      I get what you are saying, but sometimes I think we should in a way, or at least we should get republicans exposed to it, so they can live their hogwash ideas of free markets.

      • Komodo Rodeo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It won’t be them living the reality though, it will be their subordinates and employees. The same ones already being crushed to death by production metrics, stagnation of wages and inflation. The people involved in these decision making processes are too well shielded from the actual consequences, beyond maybe driving past and seeing the ruins of what used to be towns/cities/neighbourhoods destroyed by the free market and social policies.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Exactly, which is why I’m left scratching my head why the US wants to bring manufacturing back to the US. We’re much better of growing the well-paying jobs where our education systems can compete favorably vs bringing back jobs that compete with low-paying jobs…

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Sure, but the US has a lot of well-educated people (e.g. see the Education Index), as well as a lot of opportunities for well-educated people to get in-demand jobs that pay well.

          Literacy rates are interesting, but they don’t translate to well-paying jobs like education attainment rates.

          • Jhex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Sure, but the US has a lot of well-educated people (e.g. see the Education Index), as well as a lot of opportunities for well-educated people to get in-demand jobs that pay well.

            There are more Indian Engineers in the USA than American ones… and Trump is destroying all of it

            The way things are going for you, nobody with a half a choice would decide to migrate to the USA for work

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Right, and that’s completely brain-dead. We should be wanting to attract more talent, because more people able to take high-end jobs usually ends up creating more high-end jobs. We want more immigrant engineers, doctors, etc, because that encourages greater investment since the labor pool is deeper.

              But no, we’ll instead block cheap imports and encourage more blue-collar work, and if we take that too far, we’ll end up in a similar situation as we did back in the Great Depression when demand just evaporates.

              We should let developing countries develop and focus on what developed countries are better at: innovation. Attract top talent and keep investment dollars flowing so the R&D jobs stay.

      • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        LOL losers, your education is shit compared to Chinese.
        You’ve got nothing to offer to the world.

        • Hardeehar@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Hold on, in advanced education here in my area of the states, almost half the population of students in classes I see are of Chinese or Indian backgrounds and most are here on foreign visas.

          If the education is so shit, why are there so many foreign students studying here and paying insane amounts of money to do so.

          • cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I’d think enrollment rates would be a severe lagging indicator of education quality. Institutions could likely coast on reputation for quite some time after education quality tanks. Inertia is powerful, and some could even knowingly decide to go to poor educational institutions just for the status it still gives among peers and in their community.

            That said, I have no first hand experience with US higher education, and wouldn’t know what the quality really is, just saying that enrollment rates probably aren’t a great indicator of it.

    • pup_atlas@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’m not sure I see a connection between the working conditions, and the quality of the car. I don’t think anyone is advocating for adopting those bad conditions, but they also seem unrelated to the quality of design, and parts that go into it. That purely seems like a question of paying for good high-quality parts, and not skimping out on the design phase.

    • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      So then why do so many US companies have the CSRs in places overseas ? And manufacturing overseas ?

      Why did so many US companies decide to utilize those working conditions for labor for US companies ?

    • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Well yes, but actually no. BYD has quite of an advantage (also because China subsidies it), but american (and also European) companies have no incentive to actually design good quality products if BYD gets left out. At the same time CEO will try (and currently do it) to force us into working more and more for less money with less benefits while swimming in billions of dollars.

  • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    11 hours ago

    American cars have sucked compared to Asian cars since the 1970s. I don’t understand why people are acting all surprised that this is true in respect to BYD. Sure in the past products designed in China were stereotyped as poor quality knock offs of western designed goods, but in the past decade Chinese engineers have increasingly proven themselves as perfectly capable of making solid, innovative designs that improve upon those of their competitors. I think it’s kind of fucked up that everyone is so suddenly upset about China’s role in the world economy since everyone was completely fine using them for cheap labor over the past several decades and are just mad that Chinese companies are beating them at high skill labor and technology. Chinese companies do have an “unfair advantage” given how much they are backed by the Chinese government but American companies receive all sorts of money from the government for all sorts of things as well.

    • mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The “unfair advantage” bit has been incredibly funny to me ever since I sat in a call to prepare a joint research proposal and the representative of a certain large euro automotive supplier told us that their company would only participate in any project if they got at least a certain amount of government funding.

    • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      They went through a period in the 90s where they had a huge leap in quality and almost matched Japanese imports of the time. I’d say GM is the only one who’s drivetrain quality is still on any comparable level with Asian imports. Ford gets some parts really right but then their beancounters make really dumb cuts to critical components that make many of their vehicles near lemons. I can’t think of a worse car manufacturer in the world right now than Stellantis, and they aren’t an American company anyway.

    • dirthawker0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Americans have come to think of Chinese products as bad quality because of the American companies who engage them for cheaper labor. Walmart was known to order products made to a certain spec one year, then the next year demand the company increase production, but for the same amount paid as the previous year. The Chinese company, not wanting to lose the contract, obliges, but corners have to be cut. It should be called Americanesium, not Chineseum.

      Derek Guy (Die, Workwear!) posted a thread a while back (I think about 6 months ago) about how the Chinese can and do make great quality products, pointing out high quality fabrics. Give them money to buy good raw materials, give them a decent wage, and they’ll put out a good product. Honestly, they probably have a more fair work ethic than some American companies that just feed their CEOs massive salaries or are owned by private equity.

      • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Its largely american cope that they are not that good at manufacturing anymore. Chinese factories build things to spec, and the customer asks for cheap, so they get cheap.

        • Dave.@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          They also iterate very quickly.

          First car design - “functional” is being polite about it.

          Fifteen years later when they are on their tenth revision - pretty damn good.

          Meanwhile US car manufacturers can squeeze in a revision/refresh every 5 years if they’re lucky.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Honestly, there’s a wide range of quality of stuff produced in China, but the expensive stuff isn’t getting brought over. The better stuff is either being used domestically or exported to India/SEA. From my limited experience importing stuff, the biggest common factor is the lack of final quality control. I ordered some small diesel engines because no else makes those but Yanmar and Yanmar prices themselves way out of my range. Even Yanmar doesn’t sell a 5hp engine. The 196cc Chinese diesel was well designed, the parts well built, but final assembly lacks consistence on the bolt torque spec and there was metal shaving left in the crank case. The bigger, more expensive diesel made by a different company had much better quality control, although it’s still necessary to flush the crank case. No one over there seems to do that.

  • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Domestic US cars can’t compete with foreign cars. We’ve known that forever. Or at least since the 90s.

    Look no further than Kei trucks being illegal.

    Our overengineered, over priced, unnecessarily complicated crap just can’t compete with simple transport vehicles because they aren’t made as a tool to serve a purpose. Everyone wants to make a Corolla into a Cadillac and sell it for Cadillac prices.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Hmmm. I think US cars can absolutely compete. Here is the problem. Foreign manufacturers make cars that people want to buy. American manufacturers make cars that they want to sell. These two things are not the same.

      • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I want Ford Escorts, Geo Metros, VW Rabbits. I want a small, uncomplicated, economy shitbox. A small cheap car that my broke ass can fix when it breaks. And no car company that makes cars in this country makes that anymore.

    • paraphrand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Domestic US cars can’t compete with foreign cars. We’ve known that forever. Or at least since the 90s.

      Growing up in the 90s in Wisconsin, all the conservatives around me always talked shit about foreign cars.

      I can’t comprehend how they justified it. But I also knew nothing about cars.

      It was only back in ~2016 that I realized how much building a car is similar to building a computer. Supply chains, common parts, designs made to fit common “cases”. Etc etc.

  • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Newsflash: American car manufacturer says “Our cars are crap and overpriced”

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Michael Dunne is actually someone who worked in Chinese Automotive manufacturing. He’s the Chinese car manufacturer saying “Chinese cars are good and cheap.”

      His word is basically meaningless.

  • MrSilkworm@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Former GM Executive: BYD cars are better and cheaper than American. If we let BYD into the U.S. Market, we wouldn’t be able to be greedy and enshitify our products any more, which would end up destroying american car manufacturers. FTFY.

    P.S. Actually the average american would be benefited from that

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Well, nearly half a million mostly union jobs would also be lost, causing a minor recession at the very least. Even if the jobs partially come back in the form of BYD plants, they probably wouldn’t be union jobs.