Sorry if it’s a dumb question. I’m not even knocking or shaming, I just think they’re really funny and want to see more if you know of them. Not accounts that downvote, accounts that ONLY downvote. Rare ones. Like weapons-grade haters.

I’d collect them in my user tags. And like, just observe what they respond to.

    • Paragone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I do that.

      I want to see ACCURATE vote-stats on my comments, NOT with the “self-esteem-plushie” self-upvote.

      I find accuracy-of-view much more valuable than social-esteem’s “cushioning”.

      Were I to code a fediverse-server it’d have no means of upvoting/downvoting one’s own posts or comments: everything would start from zero, right where it ought, for accuracy-of-view.

      ( emotional-disinformation is a category/kind of disinformation, & it-too is a comfort-addiction among too-many of our world.

      The older I get, the more-ruthless I have to become, in order to cut-through all the disinformation-gunk that humankind’s snuffing itself, its viability with.

      Emotionally-comforting-disinformation is disinformation exactly as “paper mills” are scientific disinformation. )

      Sometimes I forget to so-so, but every now & then, I’ll go through my profile, removing any polluting upvotes.

      Accuracy’s better than pseudovalidity/comfort.

      _ /\ _

      • Skavau@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        To be fair, people don’t undo their default upvote on their posts because of self-esteem, it’s just not noticing. You are right that a more authentic system though would simply not have any default upvotes, and additionally - not allow the OP to upvote their own posts/comments.