• FauxLiving@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    I disagree with age verification as well, but attacking a person like this is gross.

    This article is all but brigading people into harassing this guy.

    • shirro@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      59 minutes ago

      Yeah, Its is sickening and goes against the spirit of open source. We work around restrictions in creative way to give people the freedom to control their software and have access to the source. We don’t deny people trapped in shitholes with bad laws access to open computing. Force them onto Windows and Apple. I don’t get what is wrong with people these days. They have lost all reason.

      Yes, many people can work around the laws in various ways. And some of them can’t. Its not for us to judge. We offer possibilities. Everyone knows many distros will patch this field out. Many will just ignore it like we do the GECOS fields. And where it is unfortunately required it is still going to be better than running Windows. Its completely orthogonal to political participation and fighting these laws.

    • tangonov@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      A spade’s a spade. This is malicious compliance. The law might be the problem here but it’s on us to resist and try to make a change. Every last one of us. After all, the surveillance state workers in China and Russia are all just doing their jobs right?

      Why the heck would we ever want a DoB field in systemd, optional or otherwise?

      • luciferofastora@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 minutes ago

        The systemd PR also referred to a flatpak PR who said they had wanted that to allow for parental controls even before the law came. That’s a somewhat reasonable use case, in my opinion.