• Nycifer@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Depends on the game. Most times it’s not even worth it because post-game after beating the game, usually means another round with only tiny differences.

    I’ve done Super Mario World multiple times, completing the Star Road and changing the koopas to have the mario heads. I’ve done The Messenger to get the Wind Shuriken, which honestly in my opinion, wasn’t worth gathering all the power seals for.

    Elder Scrolls II Daggerfall, didn’t really feel like there was anything post-content that is there to it, after doing everything. You just continue until you’re bored, which you could already do anyways by ignoring the main quest after getting the letter to meet that lady in a tavern so you wouldn’t be soft-locked out of it.

    It just depends, if there’s more meat to the bone there is, then maybe, if not and it’s just going another round of everything again then no.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Depends on the game.

    One thing I usually won’t do is reinstall a game to play content added later.

  • Björn@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    Depends on the game now, doesn’t it? I did 100 % of all content on Spider-Man. For some reason I didn’t finish Spider-Man: Miles Morales and I didn’t even start Spider-Man 2.

    Hmm, maybe I should at least try Spider-Man 2. But I’d have to finish Miles Morales first to get the full story. Spider-Man 1 was so good, maybe I’ll play that again. Spider-Man

    What were we talking about?

    • MisshapenDeviate@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      As somebody who enjoys all 3 games immensely, you don’t strictly have to play Miles Morales. You’ll be missing some of his character growth that continues throughout 2, but a lot of the broad strokes you can pick up from context.

      That said, I highly recommend playing Miles Morales.

      • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Seconded. You don’t need to have played Miles Morales at all, but I personally think it’s the best story of the three

    • Sabin10@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I haven’t done 100% on any of those, I burned out on them around the 90% mark. All three games are great, you should play them.

  • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Highly dependant on the game and the content.

    NieR Automata has you get 5 endings and see the credits roll at least twice in order to actually get all of the story, and the content is actually very different. Like the credits rolling isnt treated as the end of the game, just a way to break up the pacing.

    But if the game is highly repetitive, extremely linear, and exactly the same on subsequent playthroughs? Nah.

  • horse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I rarely even finish the main part these days. There just aren’t that many games that can hold my attention for the time they take to beat. Especially since I just don’t have as much time, as I get older, so beating a big narrative game could take months.

  • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s got to be one hell of a game for me to do it. Maybe one in 100 will I touch post game content and I don’t think I’ve finished any

    • ergonomic_importer@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Outer Wilds, for example, is a game you can only play once.

      That has not stopped me from downloading a randomizer mod to squeeze more hours out of it.

      • early_riser@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Been sitting on this one for over a year. I really enjoyed Tunic, and it seems Outer Wilds is a similar experience, relying on the player not knowing what’s coming.

      • Weirdfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Still haven’t played this one through, just downloaded it for like the third time.

        I don’t know why it hasn’t hooked me, it’s just the sort of game I should enjoy.

        • ergonomic_importer@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          The solution to the puzzles are extremely clever and you’re given just enough hints to be able to solve them, but this game demands your attention and every bit of your concentration to be able to fit it all together. The payoff is massive though, the final 30-40 minutes is one of the most memorable and emotional moments I have ever had playing video games.

        • Malix@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Friend of mine recommended it to me, and it was already on my radar as it did look very interesting. Bought it, played about an hour and proceeded to ask for a refund. It didn’t do it for me at all.

          The funny thing is that on paper it should have been a slam dunk for me, but literally nothing in-game felt like I liked doing it. Weird.

          Welp, not every game is for me, and in this case I know I’m a rare outlier. :P

  • Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Only games I can think of that I still playing after rolling credits is a multiplayer game that also has a single player campaign.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Usually once I hit the end, I hold on to see if finishing the game opened up anything new to investigate.

    Some games it’s hard to tell where “the end” is.

    Borderlands 2 required finishing the story twice before you could BEGIN the end game.

    As I get older, I care less about doing EVERYTHING.

  • QuadratureSurfer@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Depends on the game, depends on the content.

    For example, Skyrim, I could easily continue playing (or just ignore most of the main storyline).

    Compared to something like Assassins Creed 1, where any “additional content” would be the most boring/repetitive task. I was done with this as soon as the credits rolled.

    • Agrivar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Does Skyrim even have an ending? Like, a roll credits and play music ending? (I’ve got ~10k hours in that game and I can’t say that I’ve ever “finished” it!)

  • Silverchase@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Path of Exile runs credits at the end of act 3, but the whole campaign goes to act 10. And soon after that, you receive the quest line that leads to the game’s famously vast endgame. The endgame is what Path of Exile fans play for.

  • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    i think it depends on the game, imo post-game stuff is especially cool in sandbox-y games where there’s many things to do, whereas games that are more linear don’t really need it

    but what i hate more than anything is a game that won’t acknowledge you finished it. credits roll, you load your save and you’re back in front of the final boss. i hate that, it makes me feel like the game is in a perpetual state of never being completed. at least put a pretty medal on my save file or something

  • balgruuf@nord.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Depends on the game. Often post-game there’s just a checklist of chores and I’m not doing that.

  • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Currently playing Morrowind.
    Had to even remind myself recently to do some main quest for a change.

    Completely and immersively lost myself in sidequests before. :-)

    Sooo… post-game-content seems to be just game content here…

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Im one of those folks who tend to not finish games. I sorta actively avoid the ending if there is more side quests that I have not done and such.

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I treat postgame content the same as I treat new game+

    It’s super unlikely I will look into it unless the game rocked my world.

    Many games treat post game content as a grindfest for people who really liked the game but didn’t want it to end, I usually have no interest in it.

    The last games I looked into both NG+ and post game content on was final fantasy XV and God of War (the ps4 one), and I didn’t finish it on either of them.