• Samskara@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      48 minutes ago

      Not if age verification is done by a digital signature from the smart card in your government issued ID.

    • finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I didn’t see it until you pointed it out. Imo looks unintentional, just an unfortunate result of the circuit traces being arranged as they are.

      • Gonzako@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yeah, tbh a swastica is an amazing symbol, such a shame nazis made it their emblem.

  • ubergeek77@lemmy.ubergeek77.chat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    What problem does this even solve? On Linux, what app would even be asking how old you are? Web browsers for sure, and maybe electron apps like Discord? But what else is there?

    I’m on Bazzite (based on Fedora). I’m comfy with it, moving distros is a significant effort, so I’m very unlikely to ever jump ship. If I have to make a workflow that mirrors the official Bazzite images and neuters this age check, so be it. Not that complicated.

    But I’m willing to bet the community will step up and maintain browsers/apps that don’t have these age checks in the first place. Firefox has many forks that definitely won’t, and Vesktop will probably stub this out when it inevitably comes to Discord. If there’s nothing to ask for age verification, it doesn’t matter what the OS can do.

    I really don’t see a need to burn a distro I’m comfortable with, even if the upstream maintainers are a little dumb. There a ton of ways to bend a Linux distro to your will without throwing your hands up.

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Because they are corporate-backed I can understand why Fedora would need to think about this, but I would never use them again. The surveillance state will stay the fuck out of my devices. The discussion also seems to be centered on GNOME?

  • Peter1986C@piefed.europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I have a feeling that a lot of those who replied have not really read the article, that contains some nuances. I do not like the idea of age verification, but the project leader’s proposal is apparently not even official (and more like a hypothetical in a discussion thread on their forums.

    Please read more than headlines, lol.

    • sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.today
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Because media propaganda makes it seem as if the majority have certain views. People don’t like to be on the outside so if the media can trick people into conforming then they will try that.

  • jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    For solutions that back on actually “verifying” the age by requiring credit card or government ID, those suck.

    As described, this is an administrator self describing the age, which doesn’t mean much to anyone except kids of people who apply parental controls to systems their kids have access to.

    Accounts already require your “full name” but we don’t consider that “full name verification”.

    This proposal seems to be in the spirit of least intrusive means to let parents opt into this stuff if they want, with no ties to identity compromising third party/state “verification”.

    Question is whether this sort of solution that at least gives parents some chance will satisfy the lawmakers long term. For the wave of laws now, it seems to suffice to self attest age.

    • FrostyPolicy@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Accounts already require your “full name” but we don’t consider that “full name verification”.

      They don’t require anything. You can leave that empty or just put John Doe. All that is required for an account on a Linux system is a username and a password.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Well strictly speaking the full name field is always there, but a lot of people have the full name “”.

        But less pedantic, perhaps require was the writing word, but same principle, put whatever you want in dob field, default to 1970 or something.

      • Attacker94@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I don’t think they were referring to Linux in general, I think it was specifically talking about Fedora