• 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Being out of copyright is kinda irrelevant. There are lawsuits right now, because the AI firms apparently fed the AI’s tons of copyrighted books.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      It is and it isn’t. Those lawsuits mean they at least try to stop it from producing copyrighted work. They won’t make Simpsons characters or produce anything from the house of mouse without major cajoling or some trickery in the prompt.

      For the text from Frankenstein they are not even going to try.

      Incidentally after writing this content I tried to get chatgpt to reproduce the first paragraph of chapter 3. It refused and offered a summary. I “reminded” it that the book is in the public domain and then it reproduced it without issue.

      • OwOarchist@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I tried to get chatgpt to reproduce the first paragraph of chapter 3. It refused and offered a summary. I “reminded” it that the book is in the public domain and then it reproduced it without issue.

        I bet you could do exactly the same thing for a book that’s still copyrighted.

        • tempest@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I did see posts of someone doing it with Harry Potter but I think it took a little more effort

      • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        They still obviously trained it on the copyrighted text. Which I think is what some claim is illegal without payment?

        Mind you, I don’t think copyright should cover that, for text at least. It is not in society’s interest.