It seems like it would be trivial for them to reduce quality control and have customers just “deal with” chips that aren’t as stable. How come they aren’t doing this?

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s already common for chipmakers to disable cores entirely because of a single mistake. With 100 Billion+ transistors, even a doubling in error rate would 100fold the number of wasted dies.

    Making the stencils is already expensive there’s no real way to cheap out on it.