• masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Can I remind everyone that it is impossible to produce helium in a practical way?

    It is literally only produced through a fusion reaction, and that happens in stars and in incredibly tiny quantities in fusion reactors.

    Whenever it’s released, it basically just floats away into space and is lost forever.

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      It’s also produced (slowly) through radioactive decay underground where it becomes trapped with other gasses. That’s the reserve we’ve been working with.

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 minutes ago

      The one we can mine is drawn off together with natural gas, and was produced over geological timescales as product of alpha decay of uranium

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      33 minutes ago

      Can I remind everyone that it is impossible to produce helium in a practical way?

      Sun has been doing it for millions of years and it’s a big dumb ball of energy.

      Incidentally…

      Is it practical? No. Is it producing any Helium right now? No. Is it probably just a big investor scam? Sure. But still more practical than trying to conquer Iran.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        19 minutes ago

        That doesn’t actually sound like they intend on producing usable helium though. That sounds like they intend on doing a really difficult and expensive fusion reaction to produce helium 3, which they will then use in a cheaper and easier to do fusion reaction, and the end result of all of that should be electricity and no net new helium since it’s expensive and rare AF and they need it all to make the whole process remotely plausibly profitable.

      • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yeah, what a crazy headline that AI was the thing mentioned and not 1 of the many other real life uses that offer greater solutions to us.

        • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 minutes ago

          If only I could believe that’s because MRIs are more important so their supply isn’t in jeopardy.

        • Soulphite@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Maybe this is why they’re now ramping up going back to the moon? Gonna start fuckin the moon up for all that sweet Helium 3.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            35 minutes ago

            We could be at war with Iran for a century, sending strike teams in to siphon helium out of the ground and smuggle it back to the US in stealth jets and submarines, and it would still be significantly cheaper than trying to mine the moon.

      • wosat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 minutes ago

        My understanding is that MRIs don’t consume helium, in the same way air conditioning units don’t consume refrigerant, so helium is only needed for making new MRI machines.

        • fullsquare@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 minutes ago

          New ones, and not all if them, work this way, as in there’s tiny helium condensing unit. Older ones just let it go and require topping up every couple months (guessing by how often helium in NMR is topped up). Also every emergency shutdown invariably blows off all of helium inside

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        37 minutes ago

        Okay, but do you really think we’re going to prioritize the enormous loss-leading CSAM engines over lifesaving medical diagnostics machines?

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I’d guess that most industrial users of helium don’t consume it and could theoretically recover it from whatever process it’s involved in rather than just releasing it.

    EDIT: Hard drives being an exception, as apparently some ship helium-filled; there, it’s actually being consumed during the manufacture.

    EDIT2: I’d also point out that in the long run, we probably do have to be more conservative with our helium supply. We get it from pockets in the earth. It’s actually not all that common; it just happens, though, that we go to a lot of effort to extract natural gas, and that happens to sometimes also come up with helium, so we get that supply. But because it’s not reactive, it doesn’t bond to anything — it stays in gas form. When we let it go, it heads to near the top of our atmosphere and eventually gets lost to solar wind. Many users who today just release it — because why not, as the natural gas people will be providing more, and it’s cheaper that way — probably will need to capture what they’re using if we want helium to continue to be available.

    • JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The problem is that helium is notoriously hard to contain. It’s transported and stored super-cooled, but it still gases off, and to release pressure they just have to release it into the atmosphere. It effectively has a shelf life and so it has to be constantly replenished.