The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 2 years agoIt's so overlemmy.worldimagemessage-square139fedilinkarrow-up11.12Karrow-down113
arrow-up11.1Karrow-down1imageIt's so overlemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 2 years agomessage-square139fedilink
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·edit-22 years agoGod forbid I use simpler language to describe what it does. It’s pattern matching with extra steps.
minus-squareHexarei@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 years agoSimpler language is fine when it’s accurate. Your simplification is inaccurate and could mislead people into thinking GPTs are just advanced regex matching engines. They are not. They are closer to autocorrect on steroids.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoAutocorrect is fancy pattern matching. GPT is fancier pattern matching. It’s more accurate than “AI,” since there’s no actual reasoning happening.
minus-squareHexarei@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 years agoI’m gonna stop responding to this asanine thread now before you continue to demean us both with your nonsense.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoHave fun matching patterns for the rest of the day!
God forbid I use simpler language to describe what it does.
It’s pattern matching with extra steps.
Simpler language is fine when it’s accurate.
Your simplification is inaccurate and could mislead people into thinking GPTs are just advanced regex matching engines.
They are not. They are closer to autocorrect on steroids.
Autocorrect is fancy pattern matching. GPT is fancier pattern matching.
It’s more accurate than “AI,” since there’s no actual reasoning happening.
I’m gonna stop responding to this asanine thread now before you continue to demean us both with your nonsense.
Have fun matching patterns for the rest of the day!