I swear someones just using it as a harder drive at this point

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    16 小时前

    nixpkgs as a mono repo might’ve been a mistake, honestly. shithub wasn’t made for monorepos. It doesn’t have a permissions system for it.

    So many PRs get a bunch of inane comments that have nothing to do with the functionality to please somebody’s ego, the CODEOWNERS file is nearly worthless as “package maintainers” don’t even have the last say on their own packages, docs are nearly the last of the priorities making it difficult for pretty much anybody but the christened cream of the crop to make changes. It almost seems like the entire thing was made for “job security” - only a few people really understand what’s going on and thus make the decisions. That of course introduces a bottle-neck.

    Even if more people wanted to contribute, they wouldn’t be aren’t able to. I think the decision makers like it that way.

    • qaz@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 分钟前

      The entire thing consists of 6 million objects and is 5GiB. I feel like at this point they should just split the common code into a repo and have the packages in submodule buckets grouped by name like some sort of hashmap multirepo (only half kidding).

  • lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 小时前

    there are so many strange issues with nix that i’m sort of regretting not going for guix as my user mode package manager.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    16 小时前

    You underestimate the free time people who live on those forums have. They’ve probably got every single one memorized.

    • onlinepersona@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 小时前

      Probably have a list of reasons why they shouldn’t be in the community either. “They said master branch is OK: drama time!”